How many times do I have to inform the slow witted Free Thinker that he is responding to the wrong person? I don't like miraculous explanations for anything. I certainly don't like the "God made it so" explanation for the origin of life. (That of course, is no explanation at all.) But the fact is that existing theories have enormous gaps and we are no where near having a satisfactory naturalistic theory for the origin of life. That doesn't mean we will never have one, it does mean that those who claim that abiogenesis is a solved problem, and that critics of the existing theories are fools, are themselves the fools.
No, YOU'RE the idiot because earth is not a closed system and might very well have been "seeded," intentionally or not.
Science? What do you know about science, STUpid? Here you got the 96% / 4% split of dark matter & dark energy versus everything else BACKWARDS. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2952513#post2952513 And this implies don't even know that life on earth is carbon-based. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3467602#post3467602
Name calling all the time won't make you right. You have been presenting your own twisted version of science, more commonly known as pseudo science. You've also brought up the same old dead beat cut and paste articles from people who should know better, and whose arguments fall over at their first sentence anyway. You can lean or tilt toward directed evolution (God did it) all you like, but you won't do it scientifically. That's a fact. Nobel prize winners may suggest 'directed evolution' to you, but then when you read your bible, you can make it say anything you want too. Doesn't mean you're right. I think you ARE interjecting your beliefs into this all the time. It's what leads people like you and TRADERsixshits to have comprehension problems with everything that is actually said, and then read things into them to always leave room and conclude in favor of your invisible God friend. TRADERshits constantly makes an ass out of himself by always name calling (you never see me do that) and linking to his errors and blaming me. You by always name calling and constantly reposting the the same articles already refuted a thousand times. You two really should get a room.
Oh dear me come on Jem wake up for christsakes. Here..a big fat clue for you. still waiting for you to show where I said there was proof of life from non life.
You may as well have stopped at those first and second sentences. Of course there is scientific explanation of how proteins form. Even in school books. Nothing to do with miracles. So why say that? The only ones basing claims to do with proof and abiogenesis here are those who will ignore facts , much like you just did, to proudly pronounce there is no proof. Yet all the time there sits laboratory loads of proven fact, observations, repeatable tests, prediction and demonstrable outcomes that support a formal scientific study which is the highly complex subject of abiogenesis, way away from any suggestion of 'miracles'. By the tone of your comments , the currently un-resolved, un-proven parts of research you call gaps, is where apparently you find science most appealing, rather than the actual progress in the research of such matters.
"Man was born To die, nor aught exceeds in this respect The vilest brute. Both transient, frail, and vain, Draw the same breath; alike grow old, decay, And then expire: both to one grave descend; There blended lie, to native dust return'd." - C.
"Magically?" <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/j9ZRHoawyOg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=138