PT Let me know when you have conclusive proof, that I do not have conclusive proof there is no God. Until then I'll just consider your opinion has nothing to say. Many thanks.
Stu's - trolll sychosis is now complete now - stu denies he stated - "There is plenty of science showing life from non life".
Will you two just get a room already, lol. You can't seem to get along without each other. Regardless of what you say, no one can prove that God exists, or that he doesn't. A lot of smart people have tried for eons. c
And I have no problem with the later part of what you just wrote. I do not argue with reasonable statements.
Sort of. The people who have it, know it. The issue comes in proving it to those outside of yourself.
Poor STUpid lying troll... you altered my links in a desperate attempt to hide your STUpidity. What a pathetic loser you are... did you really "think" that would work? No substance? Please. This clearly shows you got the 96% / 4% split of dark matter & dark energy versus everything else BACKWARDS. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2952513#post2952513 And this clearly shows that YOU got the terminology wrong. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3362824#post3362824 Wrong again, STUpid. The calculation is Penrose's and is in at least one of his books. Have your mommy show you how to use google next time she changes your diaper.
I 'quoted' your links as you posted them. You're confused. It's Jem who alters what people say. Face it, you two have entirely lost the plot. You've nothing, no substance. You're only repeating the same dumb mantras of meaningless baseless assertion laced with infantile insult. There is no "Penrose's well known calculation". Creationists imagine such things when they see anything that can be made into something it is not.
Despite what you say, as you cannot prove God does exist, and as you also cannot prove 'it can't be proved God doesn't exist' - that would leave no reason or rational argument to base a possibility that It does exist.
Good dog. Your pathological lying only bolsters my case, so keep it up. Here's my post with the original links that work: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3478007#post3478007 And here's your "quoted" version where you altered the links so they wouldn't work: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3479820#post3479820 Penrose's well known calculation isn't known to ignoranuses like you, so it's no surprise that you're clueless about it.
I changed nothing you idiot. The links are identical. You've no argument , no substance, now you're blaming me because links won't work in the quote function. Claiming everything is wrong just because it doesn't fit with your own contorted ideas,like a wino caught in the act of stealing booze who, with the bottle in his hand, can only summon denial to shout ..."what booze". And as a creationist you can only claim Penrose has a well known calculation, but cannot explain how it is his , or how it is well known, or even show a calculation that works. That would be a first for you.