Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

Discussion in 'Politics' started by peilthetraveler, Mar 2, 2012.

  1. No, YOU have no idea because you're ignorant of Penrose's well known calculation of the tiny fraction of the phase space of possible universes one like ours could have come from.
     
    #321     Mar 17, 2012
  2. stu

    stu

    Oh come on. You've never been able to rationally follow through on any line of reasoning, but like Jem you can make plenty of false claims. If you or Jem said it was a red paint dip, it would certainly turn out to be a green one.

    Penrose's so called "well known calculation" IS apparently so well known.... but only to creationists.

    "The tiny fraction of the phase space of possible universes"...is a philosophical question not a mathematical one, and bears more of a relationship to numerology as Penrose showed in one of his books.

    Every probability calculation needs its density function and there isn't one for Penrose's so called "well known calculation".
    Even large number coincidences developed from Dirac's large numbers hypothesis, are themselves not considered applicable to constants, neither are they accepted generally in science or physics.

    In other words as a creationist, YOU don't understand that you don't understand Penrose.

    So come on, you must be bursting. Can you possibly make a rational response or can you only post some silly picture of yourself, start the name calling and do the links to previous posts where you made no sense so many times before.
     
    #322     Mar 17, 2012
  3. stu

    stu

    Lol..... and someone suggested it was atheists who were angry :D

    Well done. You are already utterly without credibility and you do even worse.

    When it comes down to the line, and you're exposed red-handed for nothing more than posting an outright lie, you can only manage to follow up with another lie and more foul language and insult.
    I wonder should one feel flattered in some way that you totally misrepresent what I and others say in the same way you do with those Nobel Prize winners you like to misquote so much.

    All that deceit for what?
    To try and find some leeway where there is none for your silly deviant theistic imaginations, though managing only to display the intellectual standards of a degenerate.

    Congratulations on reaching fully fledged moronity.
     
    #323     Mar 17, 2012
  4. stu

    stu

    There is obviously a severe need, anger and desperation in theists who will stoop to adopt any despicable effort to force a make believe God into the realms of science where it can't possibly fit or belong.
    Why the hell anyone would even want to sound so mindless to the point of perverting reasoning and accuracy as Jem and others do for nothing more than pushing a fantasy God idea, is simply just weird.

    Infected by the religion virus, some ET theists sure do work in mysterious God-awful ways.
     
    #324     Mar 17, 2012
  5. stu

    Let me know when you have conclusive proof, there is no God, until then I'll just consider it your opinion.

    Thanks in advance
     
    #325     Mar 17, 2012


  6. Let me know when you have conclusive proof, there is no leprechauns, until then I'll just consider it your opinion.

    Thanks in advance
     
    #326     Mar 17, 2012
  7. let me know when you have no conclusive proof of tooth fairy...till then i'm a true blue believer! give 30% of my $ to the tooth fairy for her great humanitarian work too! :mad:
     
    #327     Mar 17, 2012
  8. The tooth fairy is alive and well : it's the basis for keynesian economics taught in institutions for higher indoctrination.
     
    #328     Mar 17, 2012
  9. Publicus

    Publicus

    Welcome God into your self.

    Pray about it.

    It's a wonderful addition to life.
     
    #329     Mar 17, 2012
  10. i know in Heaven God rulz.

    doesn't Satan have more fun on Earth?

    disclaimer: i'm still on an Earth-like planet
     
    #330     Mar 17, 2012