Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

Discussion in 'Politics' started by peilthetraveler, Mar 2, 2012.

  1. no one has ever said we know 100% of every detail of how life began. we know maybe 70% of how it happened and none of that involves your imaginary friend.

    "science is giving christians new and interesting gaps for them to cram their ever-diminishing god into – but the inevitable effect of that is to make the god they’re arguing for the nebulous existence of so far removed from the god of the bible as to make it a completely separate entity."
     
    #301     Mar 16, 2012
  2. jem

    jem

    I dispute your qualifications to say we know 70%.
    70% of what? That seems to by more atheist hope then science.

    You have been arguing with me for years.
    Now you agree there no proof we evolved by random chance.

    Science is doing research.

    A few years ago all you et atheist clowns on ET were claiming there was proof we all got here by random chance. Guys just like you - probably your previous alias, were presenting quotes about monkeys banging on typewriters and all that tripe et atheist like to spew.

    Now after doing some research we see science does not confirm your random chance speculation. We have been blowing out your "random chance in the gaps" not the other way around.
     
    #302     Mar 16, 2012
  3. stu

    stu

    You did no such thing. What on earth is wrong with you?

    Free Thinker thinks you not stupid, yet you are invariably abusive insulting and constantly perverting the truth. That's seems pretty stupid enough.
     
    #303     Mar 16, 2012
  4. 5201 posts of "waa waa there is no GOD"

    I think we all know your opinion by now.
     
    #304     Mar 16, 2012
  5. jem

    jem

    quote from stu...

    "There is plenty of science to show how life can come from non life."

    and that is just a piece of your bullshit or designed to mislead bullshit.
    so does us a favor and stfu. You are a liar and a troll. and you almost never produce science or fact.
     
    #305     Mar 16, 2012
  6. stu

    stu


    If you're not being stupid what are you being but insane ?
    When has "can" ever meant "proof", you idiot.


    Here is some science. The 1993 Bartel/Szostak experiment demonstrates that evolution works at the fundamental molecular level and unambiguously refutes the idea that the origin of life could not have come about completely by natural circumstances.

    So why not go away , look it up, misread it, change some wording in it, and then come back with a non existent gap to fit your Goddidit into once again, just like a moron.

    The only arguments you ever want to ever make are uninformed nonsensical statements that couldn't be more wrong and untruthful.
     
    #306     Mar 16, 2012
  7. Are you jem ?
     
    #307     Mar 16, 2012
  8. jem

    jem

    That is not the context you meant asshole. Plus, you man many similarly misleading statments about proof of abiogeneisis.
     
    #308     Mar 16, 2012
  9. stu

    stu

    Quite frankly , it's taken a lot less than 150 of yours to see how you've nothing to say.

    You think maybe "waa waa there is a God" because Jem has 9983 posts trying to pretend there is.
     
    #309     Mar 16, 2012
  10. stu

    stu


    You’ve been caught telling a lie and not for the first time.
    I didn't say what you claim and I couldn't mean anything other than what I said.
    Now you're just disgracing yourself further.

    Acting dishonesty and angry obscenity are clearly your specialized subjects.
     
    #310     Mar 16, 2012