Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

Discussion in 'Politics' started by peilthetraveler, Mar 2, 2012.

  1. I'm '6.9 out 7' sure that Atheism does not exist.
     
    #241     Mar 14, 2012
  2. There is no shortcut to intellectual honesty. Atheism requires sacrifice, in that you sacrifice the illusion of immortality and the sense of transcendent purpose. But, religion requires the sacrifice of critical thinking, self determination, your time, your money, and logic. (Kate)
     
    #242     Mar 14, 2012
  3. Honesty isn't a believer in God's strong suit. If they were honest with themselves they would acknowledge they have been culturally and self deluded. But that's the way they like it. Ignorance is bliss.
     
    #243     Mar 14, 2012
  4. Brass

    Brass

    For some of the people here that's not a very big sacrifice.
     
    #244     Mar 14, 2012
  5. stu

    stu

    twofacedjoker.

    'nuf said.
     
    #245     Mar 14, 2012
  6. Brass

    Brass

    Wow. Whole chapters. But not an entire book, eh? Not even one. And you find his intellectual rigor lacking?

    Parody, right?
     
    #246     Mar 14, 2012
  7. jem

    jem

    Brass stop being a troll and deal with the science.
    Our Universe appears to be fine tuned.
    Deal with it with some intellectual rigor instead of your petty et atheist troll b.s.



     
    #247     Mar 14, 2012
  8. stu

    stu

    Jem stop being a troll and deal with the science.
    Our Universe appears to be fine tuned in the same way the Earth appears to be flat.
    Deal with it with some intellectual rigor instead of your petty et theist troll b.s.
     
    #248     Mar 14, 2012
  9. stu

    stu

    Explain again!? Why?

    The context is totally obvious when you don't misinterpret, snatch lines and soundbites out of them as you do to bend around your weired religious ideas. It starts with both Dawkins and Penrose being self-proclaimed atheists.

    Dawkins is the last person to suggest what your silly cut & paste nonsense from some GodrUS website is trying to dishonestly claim.

    Penrose as the top mathematician and physicist you say he is, would never rationalize probability in the way your chosen form of hogwash tries to suggest. The truncated video you keep constanstantly puking up won't change that fact.

    It's all bogus , out of context and what is very telling is how religious views are so often based on utter crap like that.
    If you weren't so hell bent on ignoring context you might realize it.

    You will never be able to drag science or math in particular down to the level of religion or religious belief. They just would no longer be science or math.
     
    #249     Mar 14, 2012
  10. Why in the world would you put Science and Mathematics in the same category. One is a religion to counteract another religion while the other is time tested.
     
    #250     Mar 14, 2012