I doubt you could introduce yourself at a party . What you introduce is a version of -take a scientist out of context sound bite pseudoscience - trying to make space for a sky wizard. Doesn't wash, no matter how many times you repeat the same old tired horseshite.
How did this "god" design the universe ? What tools or methods were used for this design ? Is this all you have for your god did it theory, a scientist said it appears designed. What about your theory of the theory of how god came to be ? Is it one singular god or a couple of gods or are there many, and why?
#1) I don't have any imaginary friends. #2) I'm not angry at atheists, I think they are arrogant sad little creatures.
Just because it "appears" to have been "designed" does not mean that Dawkins actually believes it was "designed." Did you not get the underlying rationale from reading his books? Did you read his books? Did you ready any of his books? Or are you just a sound bite enthusiast?
I was going to ignore this, because I am worried I have been arguing with a person who does not comprehend... but you have been such a dick at times... Do you understand the difference between evidence and conclusion? I will try and teach on your level... When you are watching a law show on t.v. and the visiting guest star makes a great legal argument to the jury... do you say wow good evidence, the show is over? Or do you wait for your favorite star to come out and argue for a new way interpret that evidence - perhaps with the aid of the detective? Or... when you were watching My Cousin Vinnny... did you think the boys really killed the guy at the mini mart after the prosecution presented evidence and rested? <object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/EdCkrHa-pfY?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/EdCkrHa-pfY?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
how can a thinking person be angry at something that is a figment of a believers imagination? are you angry at the leprechauns? willfull ignorance of believers is the stupidity i was talking about. like this little jem from a christian college. "if conclusions contradict the word of God, the conclusions are wrong no matter how many scientific facts may appear to back them."biology textbook printed by conservative Christian publisher Bob Jones University Press
Actually, studies have shown that the faithful are generally happier and more psychologically stable than atheists.