Well I know subtleties escape you but there is big difference between amino acids from comets and life. But in the interest of honest discourse I must concede that by saying life must have come from non-life because there was none before on earth, misses the point that there may have been transpermia, which I spoke about in another post. But IMO transpermia still requires life to have evolved from non-life somewhere else and brings us no closer to a requirement for God.
Well regardless of what your interpretation of Hawking is, the fact is, not only can't we know what was before the big bang, we can't even know what happened immediately afterward. This is a fact that is universally accepted by all physicists and cosmologists.
Maybe the link is clear, but you're not. The fact that I said now that amino acids can be delivered by comet does not contradict my earlier statement that life came from nonlife on earth. Why is that so hard for you to comprehend? Amino acids are only building blocks, they are not life......... Little boy.
6, there is no point in arguing with futurecurrents. He is a broken record and purveyor of nonsensical logic. He is incapable of thinking for himself and learning anything. You might as well just give up and put him on ignore since we can't reach out and slap him silly.
Anything "delivered by comet" is NOT a "simple terrestrial process" dumbass. You're just backpedaling.
"The favoured view now, and the one that Hawking shares, is that there were in fact many bangs, scattered through space and time, and many universes emerging therefrom, all perfectly naturally. The entire assemblage goes by the name of the multiverse. Our universe is just one infinitesimal component amid this vast â probably infinite â multiverse, that itself had no origin in time. So according to this new cosmological theory, there was something before the big bang after all â a region of the multiverse pregnant with universe-sprouting potential." http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/sep/04/stephen-hawking-big-bang-gap I know there is probably a better source but I'm not looking around all night for it.
First of all, nobody has any idea. Scientists don't even have a clue about the 96% of our universe they currently call dark matter and dark energy. Second, has it ever occurred to any of you rabid atheists that what the ancients called God, may in fact be as natural in the scheme of things as stars?