An amino acid has been found on a comet for the first time, a new analysis of samples from NASA's Stardust mission reveals. The discovery confirms that some of the building blocks of life were delivered to the early Earth from space. Amino acids are crucial to life because they form the basis of proteins, the molecules that run cells. The acids form when organic, carbon-containing compounds and water are zapped with a source of energy, such as photons â a process that can take place on Earth or in space. Previously, researchers have found amino acids in space rocks that fell to Earth as meteorites, and tentative evidence for the compounds has been detected in interstellar space. Now, an amino acid called glycine has been definitively traced to an icy comet for the first time. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17628-found-first-amino-acid-on-a-comet.html
1. I already quoted you verbatim on a previous thread. You lie about everthing... so I will just leave you with the science which counter your antiquated notions. And note, you ignorant fool... directed evolution does not necessarily mean God did it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_Universe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
Which was pretty much predicted by the founder of DNA science, Crick ... since it is unlikely non life evolved into life here on earth... it did not have a enough time. And note... here is a quote from your article which shows what and ignorant tool Stu has been in this issue. "We are interested in understanding what was on the early Earth when life got started," Elsila told New Scientist. "We don't know how life got started ... but this adds to our knowledge of the ingredient pool.
Penny dropped at last. You quoted me verbatim as much as I quoted you verbatim when I said you admitted to being an atheist. But hey, you're getting there. You've started linking to places where there is at least more of the whole picture other than the usual -religiously skewed quote mined edited out of all context web cut and paste - crap. You just linked above to a number of ways the building blocks of life do get started and how life could feasibly, and in all reality, must have physically continued from it. So don't you think ( well no you don't but...) Elsila must mean more on the lines of "We don't know [the specific processes yet of ] how life got started ... in view of all that scientific evidence you've attached to? ......considering how the only possibilities are those scientific explanations or the imaginary skullduggery of a make-believe deity .
The atheist vs believer thing is just too stupid to waste much time on. When all the arguments are said and done they both have the same analogous problem. The believer must solve " who created God". and the atheist must solve "how did something come from nothing". Take note in how both conundrums are the same question looked at from a different perspective.
"the atheist must solve "how did something come from nothing"." No he doesn't. The atheist never says something came from nothing. In fact, nothing ever comes from nothing. Everything everywhere is just re-arranged stuff that was something somewhere before. The theist has to explain where God came from.
Hummm, nothing is nothing, syntax Please explain where the something somewhere before came from? You can peel back the onion all you want but somewhere back in the line, something had to originate from nothing, a starting point to all matter.
no one is trying to solve the who created God... because you are thinking in a linear fashion within time. Outside of time (time started after the big bang) ... there may be no before.
The rocket scientist in charge of the project says this... "We are interested in understanding what was on the early Earth when life got started," Elsila told New Scientist. "We don't know how life got started ... but this adds to our knowledge of the ingredient pool." Stu the fraud then tries to change the meaning... in order to support his 5 year fraud. Note... to Stu --- we have no proof life evolved from non life. Nothing you say or do can change that. Stu you moronic binary thinker... between random chance and the God of Abraham is an array of interesting possibilities.