You mean the 'don't know' that reached a conclusion based on no evidence and against what evidence does exist -versus- the 'don't know' that says arriving at a conclusion based on no evidence and contrary to what evidence does exist is known as fantasy. The answer's staring you in the face. That'll be why you can't see it.
To keep a positive attitude for them I agree with stu(pid) , cheese whiz and future cunts : there is nothing for them after death.
Your arguments (or lack there of) here make no more sense than your arguments with jem. You should take up another line of work. This one isn't working out for you.
You need to bow out, you are no jem and are no match for stu. Go back to starting useless pro republican, anti Obama threads.
LOL. And you are no Rectum. I've never seen stu proffer a legitimate argument. Can you point one out for me? BTW, are you ever going to answer the question I asked you several posts ago or are you just going to keep changing the subject because you are a clueless jerk?
Another dodge of my question I see. Do you lack the balls to face the answer or just the intellectual honesty? How about this? I don't know how short/skinny/long/thick your "arrow" is simply because I've never seen it. You, or stuPID either for that matter, have never "seen" (experienced) death. Ergo you simply DO NOT KNOW what IF anything happens next/lies beyond. I have my own personal theory about many if not most atheists. I think they don't have the stones to face the POSSIBILITY of roasting in Hell, so they convince themselves there is no God/heaven/hell. A very common human behavior I would think even you would have to admit, making it at least very plausible. (I won't even mention the countless "near death" experiences where people clinically dead have shared very similar experiences. You guys would simply dismiss them as brain chemicals or dreams.) You give stuPID too much credit.