Dire Warning About Secular Progressivism In America

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pspr, Mar 22, 2013.

  1. stu

    stu

    I'd bet you're right. A five worder was probably pushing it.
     
    #171     Mar 25, 2013
  2. 1) I know you didn't mean race, i think that's obvious in my post. As for posts where u inject race where it wasn't being discussed.. there are plenty, but I'm sure as shit not gonna look for them.

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...60087&perpage=6&highlight=racism&pagenumber=2

    2) Post some evidence that 'pure' laissez faire capitalism DOES NOT work.
     
    #172     Mar 25, 2013
  3. Really, where or when?
     
    #173     Mar 25, 2013

  4. 1. Totally out of context.

    2. I said PURE capitalism does not work.

    Evidence?

    Robber barons of yesterday, banksters of today.
     
    #174     Mar 25, 2013
  5. Please highlight the rest of the sentence for proper context, thank you.
     
    #175     Mar 25, 2013
  6. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Your claim is utterly ridiculous.

    I don't need a link dumb ass.
     
    #176     Mar 25, 2013
  7. 1) omg bro, I said.. ironically. I FUCKING KNOW you weren't talking about race.

    2) You're banksters of today is NOT an example of pure capitalism, or anything resembling capitalism at all, dopey. As for 'robber barons' as the term applies in America, they are/were a shining example of capitalism at work, UNLESS they get in bed with the govt. Which is a failure of GOVERNMENT, not capitalism.

    Point is pure capitalism surely works, and works better than everything else. Pure socialism on the other hand is essentially communism, and has never worked, and will never work.
     
    #177     Mar 25, 2013
  8. Show me anywhere where socialism has worked of it's own?
     
    #178     Mar 25, 2013
  9. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    better yet, ask Buckwheat for a link
     
    #179     Mar 25, 2013
  10. Maybe trend will help him with that. :eek:
     
    #180     Mar 25, 2013