Did Valerie Jarret Give The Benghazi 'Stand Down' Order?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pspr, Aug 8, 2013.

  1. pspr

    pspr

    It seems likely.
    ---

    Scandal: The omnipresent power behind the throne some have called the president's Rasputin had the power to call off three strikes against Osama bin Laden. She may have used that power again the night four Americans died in Benghazi.

    The Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack on our diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, came while America failed to mount a rescue mission despite sufficient time and assets. Included in that disaster were the unaccounted whereabouts of President Obama during eight critical hours, the lack of Situation Room photos, the failure by the president to follow up with subordinates before his trip to Las Vegas and the fabricated story that the whole thing was prompted by an Internet video.

    Columnist Charles Krauthammer said recently on "The O'Reilly Factor" that the "biggest scandal of all" regarding that Benghazi slaughter has yet to emerge.

    "I think there is a bigger story here ... that will in time come out," Krauthammer said. "The biggest scandal of all, the biggest question is: What was the president doing in those eight hours?"

    The columnist noted: "He had a routine meeting at 5 o'clock. He never after, during the eight hours when our guys have their lives in danger, he never called the secretary of defense, he never calls the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, he never calls the CIA director."

    One of the people Obama always talks to is Valerie Jarrett. She emerged from the same Chicago cauldron of radicalism where Obama got his ideological baptism.

    The Iranian-born Jarrett (her parents were American-born expatriates) is the only staff member who regularly follows the president home from the West Wing to the residence and one of the few people allowed to call the president by his first name.

    Her influence is shown by an account in Richard Miniter's book "Leading From Behind: The Reluctant President and the Advisors Who Decide for Him."

    It relates that at the urging of Jarrett, Obama canceled the operation to kill Osama bin Laden three times before approving the Navy SEAL mission in Pakistan on May 2, 2011. Seems she was concerned about political harm to Obama if the mission failed.

    Miniter writes that the president canceled the kill mission in January 2011, again in February and a third time in March, in each instance at the urging of Jarrett. Miniter cites a source within the Joint Special Operations Command who had direct knowledge of the operation and its planning.

    Edward Klein, author of "The Amateur," a best-selling book about Obama, asked Obama if he ran every decision by Jarrett, and the president responded, "Absolutely."

    A former foreign editor of Newsweek and editor of the New York Times Magazine, Klein describes Jarrett as "ground zero in the Obama operation, the first couple's friend and consigliere."

    Did Obama run the Benghazi decision not to send help past Jarrett that night?

    We do know Obama had a face-to-face briefing from Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, early in the evening.

    After dinner in his living quarters, Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu discussed Iran and other issues in a two-hour phone call.

    Present as the call was made, reports blogger Chip Jones at Conservative Report Online, was Valerie Jarrett, who, as the call was ending, went from the living quarters to the White House Situation Room, where the attack in Benghazi was being monitored by Dempsey, Panetta and other top-ranking officials.

    What she may have said and whether the president sent her is unknown. We do know the president retired for the night, and no rescue mission was launched.

    Once before, Jarrett had called off the military for political purposes. She may have done it that night as well — an action that would answer many questions and may be what the White House is really hiding.


    http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...ett-gave-benghazi-stand-down-order.htm?p=full
     
  2. LEAPup

    LEAPup

    I'm damned near sick of reading all of the damning evidence that clearly shows our traitor in chief is complicit in the deaths (and subsequent cover up), of four Americans, yet nothing changes. My question is why isn't this tyrant on trial already? Why aren't the rest of his gestapo on trial?:mad:
    And aren't all of us somewhat to blame for ALLOWING this shit to continue. I think our Founding Fathers would take issue with us first, then deal with the tyrants second...
     
  3. Half of us are, for sure.... the half which goes along with "whatever Odumbo, et al, do is OK with me... so long as I get my government check".

    :mad:
     
  4. pspr

    pspr

    Unless those willing to act can prove Obama was guilty of "High crimes and misdemeanors" there isn't much moral people can do when they are outnumbered by the amoral.

    The problem is that nearly all Democraps and many other politicians have become convinced that party trumps morality. I think the Founding Fathers knew the country would only last so long before it fell from 'grace' and de-evolved into another tyranny or dictatorship. It's analogous to the second law of thermodynamics.
     
  5. Ditto!

    :mad: :mad:
     
  6. LEAPup

    LEAPup

    Oh yes, that half is ripping America to shreds. The other half (the last real Americans), are also to blame. Our Founding Fathers would raise mortal Hell with us, then demand we organize, and do something to restore THEIR country, and Constitution.

    If we just had one leader. A true leader who would rise up, organize the working half of us, we could stop the assault on our country. One idea: how about we all stop paying taxes until the assault on our Constitution stops? I bet that would get the gubment's attention FAST. What, are they going to put 100M people in federal prison? I don't think so.
     
  7. LEAPup

    LEAPup

    I don't think our Founding Fathers EVER saw America becoming another tyranny. They worded the Constitution so exactly that wouldn't happen, or at least gave power to the people to use force (legally under the Constitution), to stop it.
     
  8. Two sides to this. The parasite half has the advantage... as they need do nothing.... benefits and advantages rain down upon them, regardless, making them "unified", "united in their greed".

    The other half... there's a thesis in arguing their/our side.

    Until 100 Million citizens take up arms and march on Washington, there will be no diversion from the destructive path we find ourselves upon now.

    :mad::(
     
  9. LEAPup

    LEAPup

    I think an armed revolt is exactly what the sickos in this admin want. That way they could impose martial law, and disarm America for good. After that, they could damned near anything they want to us. That bastards!

    I'd say we should take a page out of 1960's history, and look at what Dr. MLK did. Pure civil disobedience. If we just had a leader... One who could get those of us that pay taxes to stop until this regime stops attacking OUR Constitution. GUARANTEE that would get some MAJOR attention!
     
  10. Oh, so you racists have a problem with Valerie Jarret calling the shots. The nerve of some people.
    This bitch has some serious fire power. She must have some real dirt on the HNIC. Either that, or gives one hell of a BJ.
    http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/22/who-is-valerie-jarrett/

    From another article:
    What do you think the right thing to do is?" As president, he likes to have her next to him "as the voice of authentic blackness in a White House that is staffed largely by whites."

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012...endence_on_valerie_jarrett.html#ixzz2bOxtwbDk

    "authentic blackness". Interesting term. Wonder what it means, not that I don't already know.
     
    #10     Aug 8, 2013