TK9 admits he has an addiction, then gets pissed off and pouts like a child when someone points out his mental illness and his inability to cope with it... He is found trying once again to deflect away from his own lost condition...
Oh you mean your own foot that you are perpetually sticking in your own mouth...I would guess that foot is riddled with fungus...
i won't be argumentative either, i see your point of view, i'll just explain mine so we may compare notes: . when speaker A uses words such as Science, Did (notion of "past"), God, Melon etc, in order to communicate and in this case ask for an opinion, from a 3rd party, that doesn't imply in any way that speaker A presupposes anything about the terms used to ask the question, nor the concepts they represent in the minds of the listeners... simply that speaker A believes that his thus posed question is intelligible enough for purposes of an exchange of opinions (or in other cases, of information), a meaningful one wherever possible... that's what reporters do day in day out for instance, and so do teachers etc . a listener might be bothered by the logical sequence in cases where predicate A is false or meaningless to him/her for instance, and the question posed is about whether predicate A in some ways is related to predicate B, predicate that the listener considers to be true or meaningful for instance. of course there would then be a way for speaker A to reformulate so that predicate B appears first in the question, thus making it easy on this particular listener. but equally there is nothing to stop the listener to simply reject A for instance, or reformulate A to his/her satisfaction, or simply propose another predicate C as being related to B in a more meaningful manner etc. speaker A can only control the form of the question, not the answers . if one wants to know what speaker A's answer is to the question, one must first ask speaker A the question. any other presupposition, inference etc is only made in the mind of the listener, and unless speaker A validates the assumptions made by the listener or has previously made statements upon which the listener can validly base his/her assumptions, those presuppositions, inferences etc are as likely to be wide off the mark as not... therefore not very useful how about a separate thread on the use of language? ;-)
mate, do you always feel compelled to act like that when people have opinions that differ from yours?
========= Right, & goes deeper than that,God inspired[Godbreathed] the old/new testament. Have a book by H.F.W Gesenius , Hebrew Lexicon to old testament,beginning the scientific study of Semitics/hebrew grammar