I'm sorry, I could have used other words. I just don't understand why somebody with a repuation would write such an article, about such a speculative stock. Even if it is a good investment, to many it will appear to be not well intended (or perhaps it's just me). Someone posted this in response to the article.
I would best describe that remark as "factually inaccurate." And back to only 10, are we? Unless you're counting each time I asked the same question as it remained unanswered in your response posts. And were my questions disparaging in any way? Were they not natural and logical questions to ask of someone who wrote the article that you did? If you are so touchy about the subject matter, then perhaps you should refrain from writing about it. And certainly you should not make yourself available here only to ignore questions while pretending to discuss the subject. I have yet to insult you, something that was never my intent, and you have already attacked my credibility and lied about what has transpired thus far. Did I miss anything?
I was writing about google really. Its an interesting story about them. I have no real worthwhile interest either side. It was just an interesting story to me because I went to grad school with the main guy involved. I never once in the article recommend a buy or a short of anything. The merger with Vringo is not even done. As for my record: INHX went from 1.80=>26 AAPL from 350 => 650 CIGX from 1.50 to 3+ PIP from 1.50-1.80 (round trip from 5) and on and on. ANd yet for some reason anonymous people keep asking me to defend myself.
Rather than me doing it, can you please go back and look at all the questions you asked me and all of the ones I politely answered. Then I ask you one question and you never responded. Really, this is enough said. I'm signed off now.
Read between the lines, he failed at one thing and now he is back at what he can do. Writing pumps...sorry, I mean articles about small float stocks is the easiest way to make profit - you only need a handful of buyers to lift the stock considerably. He is trying to "help" the readers just like Goldman Sachs is trying to "help" their clients.
It seems to me Altucher found a way to monetize that blog of his. VRGN is going crazy since his article.
I would be curious as to what they say changed to make it easier these days. Personally, I have not spent much time wondering about easy or hard. Making money consistently is far more engaging.