If they were paid for the study, it wouldn't be a bribe, dummy. It would be a sponsored study and it would list the sponsors. Instead they pretended to be independent without disclosing they were making money off their study by peddling Ivermectin and being shill consultants for phrama companies.
LOL. You don’t understand clearly how this works. A paid consultant who disclosed their conflict, regardless of when, is not a bribe recipient. Hilarious. They didn’t make money off the study. Complete lie. Meanwhile Pfizer produces clinical trials and sponsors studies that are known bullshit but provide the results they pay for. How many shots dingaling???
You don’t understand how bribes work. Your hero Bourla and Bancel are the ones bribing, not some poor Brazilian researchers. “Dr. Cadegiani provided a one-time free-lancer service for Vitamedic (US$ 1,600.00), an ivermectin manufacturer, and recommended against the drug.” https://www.researchgate.net/public..._complete_version_-_Itajai_ivermectin_studies you are Really bad at this. HOW MANY POKES PINCUSHION?
You keep repeating this lie, where did they disclose the conflict of interest? Check the paper link, CUREUS added the conflict of interest after other researchers pointed it out, none of the authors of the paper ever mentioned it to CUREUS or anyone else until they got caught.
Except the paper you linked to has Lucy Kerr as one of the authors Lucy Kerr: Paid consultant for both Vitamedic, an ivermectin manufacturer, and Médicos Pela Vida (MPV), an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Why isnt that mentioned in the disclosure? Also even though Flavio didn't disclose his conflict of interest in the other paper, he did disclose his connection in this study. Except this goes against your narrative But Flávio Cadegiani, one of the authors, told AFP in an October 7, 2022 email that the study "is insufficient for the approval of the drug for Covid-19." LMFAO
LOL. Concerned with $1600 ‘conflicts’ Unconcerned about billions in graft from actual criminal enterprises. Won’t take one of the safest drugs in history. Will pump body full of experimental biological. None of this is relevant to the study. None had any bearing on it. Just another vaxxtard trying to deflect from what the study says. How many, pincushion?
Yup. That’s why I posted it. You had no clue. Sounds like a BRIBE. LOOOOL This is why idiots like you should never get involved in science. You have no clue what’s going on. Just make Flat Whites and take more safe ‘vaccines’ How many shots, pincushion?
You completely ignored Lucy Kerr's conflict of interest. You also ignored that the author of the study you quoted said Ivermectin isn't the right treatment for COVID-19. Here is something you will be interested in given your obsession with heart disease Xie, Y., Xu, E., Bowe, B. et al. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med 28, 583–590 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01689-3 We show that, beyond the first 30 d after infection, individuals with COVID-19 are at increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease spanning several categories, including cerebrovascular disorders, dysrhythmias, ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease, pericarditis, myocarditis, heart failure and thromboembolic disease. These risks and burdens were evident even among individuals who were not hospitalized during the acute phase of the infection and increased in a graded fashion according to the care setting during the acute phase (non-hospitalized, hospitalized and admitted to intensive care). Our results provide evidence that the risk and 1-year burden of cardiovascular disease in survivors of acute COVID-19 are substantial.
Weak whataboutism Feel free to post evidence with a peer reviewed study showing the vaccines are causing excess deaths. Study is sponsored by an Ivermectin manufacturer, how is that not relevant? They are paying doctor's for the study who then go on to promote Ivermectin in their private practice. Why isn't that relevant to the study which doesn't even publish their data.