In fairness, it was one of the few meds that showed in-vitro promise when scientists were throwing everything at the virus at the onset of the pandemic. It remained an authorized 'trial' med by the NIH since it's fairly harmless, but no, it has not panned out.
Tell that to the Docs who saved tens to hundreds of thousands of lives using it. Those were my doctors. Your doctors told you to go to emergency when you turned blue to they could put you in a vent and give you Remdesivir which essentially was a death sentence.
Tell me you don’t understand how generic drugs work. Making billions is what your Pfizer overlords did selling an EUA biological piece of shit - and you bought it.
Nope. I posted one that’s peer reviewed. Doesn’t matter what you think of it. and I’ve posted dozens before you can look them up. How many shots did you take? What number are you on? When will you get your next one?? Are you up to date vaxtard?
Ya, 'observational study' which didn't even track who took the drug is sure shot way to jump to conclusions. Not to mention, you can't even tell who peer reviewed it And then there is this Dr. Pierre Kory, one of the main authors of this trial, very recently opened a telehealth facility called the Advanced COVID-19 Care Center, it is a practice specifically designed to treat COVID-19, as well as post vaccine syndrome (whatever that is). He charges $250 for the Prevention & Early Treatment, which includes texting or phone call and for another $100 you can give a nurse visit. This is the visit where Ivermectin is prescribed for prevention of COVID. Kory charges $350 for an Acute COVID-19 Treatment Visit which includes texting or phone conversation with a nurse and a follow-up. And, for $950 you can have the long-haulers visit or the post vaccination syndrome visit (did they make this 'syndrome' up so that they could prescribe more ivermectin?) And, of course, they specialize in the use of, you guessed it, Ivermectin... Also, they only accept credit card payment. No insurance is accepted. This is per the website of the COVID treatment consulting firm. I believe these men and women are grifters and they are grifting off the lives of people who are vulnerable to their tall tale. I'd say there is a conflict of interest and I applaud Cureus for pointing this out being Dr. Pierre Kory did not disclose this information himself.
Read what? Where is your peer reviewed paper showing vaccines are causing excess deaths? Provide a link already.
Here are some of the doctor's that wrote your 'peer reviewed paper' In case you decided not to read the correction to this article dated March 24, 2022, this is what it states: It is quite disturbing. Article published: January 15, 2022 (see history) Article corrected: March 24, 2022 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.c61 Cite this correction as: Kerr L, Cadegiani F A, Baldi F, et al. (March 24, 2022) Correction: Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching. Cureus 14(3): c61. doi:10.7759/cureus.c61 Correction It has come to the attention of the journal that several authors failed to disclose all relevant conflicts of interest when submitting this article. As a result, Cureus is issuing the following erratum and updating the relevant conflict of interest disclosures to ensure these conflicts of interest are properly described as recommended by the ICMJ: Lucy Kerr: Paid consultant for both Vitamedic, an ivermectin manufacturer, and Médicos Pela Vida (MPV), an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Flavio A. Cadegiani: Paid consultant ($1,600.00 USD) for Vitamedic, an ivermectin manufacturer. Dr. Cadegiani is a founding member of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Pierre Kory: President and Chief Medical Officer of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Dr. Kory reports receiving payments from FLCCC. In February of 2022, Dr. Kory opened a private telehealth fee-based service to evaluate and treat patients with acute COVID, long haul COVID, and post-vaccination syndromes. Jennifer A. Hibberd: Co-founder of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance and World Council for Health, both of which discourage vaccination and encourage ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Juan J. Chamie-Quintero: Contributor to the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and lists the FLCCC as his employer on his LinkedIn page.
@LacesOut won't even link to the study because the journal itself is calling the paper out for it's bullshit "All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work." What doesn't shock me is that two of the authors, Flavio A. Cadegiani and Pierre Kory are both founding members and MATH+ and I-MASK+ developers, otherwise known as the Ivermectin Protocol, developed by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, FLCCC Alliance. Seems to me, there is no greater conflict of interest, with a clear bias. Both of these men performed the analysis and interpretation of clinical and demographic data generated by the statistical analysis. Flavio A. Cadegiani designed and performed the statistical analysis, while Pierre Kory was also responsible for reviewing the data and the manuscript. So, you have two men who clearly want a particular outcome from this study due to the current organization they now control, FLCCC Alliance. Their main focus is on the use of Ivermectin, calling it the "cornerstone of COVID-19 treatments," as they declare the supposed benefits of Ivermectin in their MATH+ protocol for pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis (according to the 66th version of their guide). These men and their organization, FLCCC Alliance clearly have much to gain with a positive outcome, in their favor, from this study. https://www.cureus.com/articles/821...ts-using-propensity-score-matching#appendices