Determinism of the International Political Economy is now Sino centric?

Discussion in 'Economics' started by Jai, Jun 9, 2012.

  1. yeah, I use to like that Chech Pilsner, it had that good old dry and dusty taste.

    The last movie I went to was back in the 90's, I walked out halfway through.

    I agree, by the time everybody likes it, it is usually pure shit. There's no accounting for taste.

    But getting back to the topic, I think it has something to do with Chinese dominance, but not sure what it is they are trying to dominate, hopefully it is something more than beer or movies.
     
    #11     Jun 9, 2012
  2. "Give me control of a nation's money supply, and I care not who makes its laws." --Rothschild

    Just print up your own money exclusively for your friends/family/community.
    Hitler did the same.
    http://goo.gl/CKppN
     
    #12     Jun 10, 2012
  3. legalize it
     
    #13     Jun 10, 2012
  4. legalize what? if it is legal - it cannot be good.....
     
    #14     Jun 10, 2012
  5. yeah, that was Mark Twains best quote "Everything I like is bad for me."
     
    #15     Jun 10, 2012
  6. #16     Jun 10, 2012
  7. Jai

    Jai




    I gibe with your point (whereas others did deviate off from the topic or were too unnecessarily judgmental on this debate/topic). Anyways, National Socialism as had in Nazi Germany is now the same in China & what the Chinese govt. have term it as 'Socialism with Chinese characteristics'.

    Prolusioning the podium of International Political Economy (IPE) here and contextualizing it in the arena of this subject/debate/topic, the so-called English school adaptable in Global Economic Policy of China & its International Relations would not anymore entice Japan's invasion as such (unless and until the US spending & presence continues in Okinawa province & specifically in South China sea) but however China would not plot direct attack against US/West as such Realism would prove costly for the holistic IPE. Anyhow, I wouldn't mind propositioning to state that under the ambit of Economic diplomacy (commonly known as Soft Power) - - China does enjoy a position higher than the West of which the US (debt up to $14 trillions) is not able to gulp, in it which China is boun to systematically incinerate the dollar hegemony (You might know the recent direct foreign exchange trading between Japan & China does serve an example, and also the Multilateralist BRICS which is constantly & instantly a failing mechanism; I hope Congress men back there do not 'grimace').
     
    #17     Jun 10, 2012
  8. well, that's the problem, there is just too much prolusioning going on, especially at the podium
     
    #18     Jun 10, 2012
  9. otherwise, I gibe with your point too, you are a cool cat daddyo, I'm picking up good vibrations, the ambit of Economic diplomacy is way cool, as a matter of fact, it's so cool it is bad, it makes me grimace.
     
    #19     Jun 10, 2012
  10. jem

    jem

    The more I hear about debt free currency the more "prolusioned" I become. I am also prolusioned with the zero personal tax idea to help stimulate at its core.
     
    #20     Jun 10, 2012