Anything being used is not some school movement to introduce CRT as Youngkin and DeSantis claim to scare stupid voters. You and your ilk claim repeated that the state and the school districts are putting this in their district or state wide curriculums. Your example proved that is not true, we have a teacher who went out on their own and got caught. The Desantis and others cliche they are using to scare parents for elections is that school districts are introducing items into the curriculum which is proven not to be true as is the case here. It was not the State or the school district or even the school. It was a teacher who did it and got caught the materials were removed completely. The system worked. The narrative that this is being introduced because the State sponsored this in any way is false. I agree it is in appropriate and so did the school, district and State.
Nobody is ok with this.... that is why the school district removed the materials immediately when it was found that a teacher WENT OUTSIDE THE CURRICULUM and downloaded the sheet online. System in place worked!
I wouldn't object at all if a Dem governor banned 71% of any books unless I first knew what books were banned. I certainly wouldn't do it on principle without the knowledge in advance.
Ok, so on the subject of CRT, you agree. On the subject of the books themselves, you have no idea (because you haven't reviewed the books). On the subject of DeSantis crowing over it and doing what any politician would do to score points, you disapprove. I'd say that's a good view of your stance. Would you agree?
"Me and my ilk claim repeated that the state and the school districts are putting this (CRT) in their district or state wide curriculums". Really. Me and my ilk have made repeated claims to this, have we?
So basically there is no proof whatsoever that a single one of those math books contain CRT subject material. Would you agree?
I would. And there's no proof that there isn't. So you can't say there isn't, and I can't say there is. The Florida DoE said there is, so unless you've got proof otherwise, you really shouldn't say shit, right?
Not CRT, but related to Florida statute 847.012 Here are examples of books removed that violate the statute AND were in circulation (and the schools they were). Please let me know which book should not have been removed as examples of "Harmful Materials" to children. Remember, we were told this wasn't in schools. The first book alone "Two Boys Kissing" I don't need to read in order to get the meaning right off the bat. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21187161/media-materials-for-review.pdf
Show me any reviewer that has the list. What's more, show me the list of the books. To say "no reviewer has a found a hint" doesn't mean shit if no reviewer has actually even seen the list. The DoE in Florida reviewed, and they did.