DeSantis for the win

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Tsing Tao, May 21, 2020.

  1. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Just because an unsubstantiated report motivated by smear campaign managers gets some air time and is summarily picked up by all the same left wing media rags doesn't mean you should post it over and over, Futurecurrents.

    Researchers claim they chose Florida specifically because of its rush to get back to normal. With state officials urging the state to go back to work in spite of the raging pandemic, they figured (correctly) that they would find official numbers well out of whack with reality.
    One thing we agree with. They chose Florida because Florida made their "science" look like the utter rubbish it was. So now they're trying to get back and save face.

    Must be tough for people claiming the election was legitimate and to "believe the data" (I do, incidentally) to suddenly say "we can't believe the data" when it comes to numbers they don't like.
     
    #3451     Mar 30, 2021
  2. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Just providing you with the hard numbers ---- so you can educate yourself on the under-reporting of COVID deaths in Florida.

    But you have already made it perfectly clear that you believe it is totally acceptable for politicians to hide and manipulate public health data in order to drive their political agenda -- so you don't need to provide your typical response of "I don't care'.
     
    #3452     Mar 30, 2021
  3. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    You mean you're providing me with an unsubstantiated "report" released by a group who is motivated to undermine DeSantis, backed by left wing papers that have been attacking him over and over again for the last few years despite DeSantis making them looking like complete asses. And you, of course.

    Right, and all of the "data" random groups provided on the election being manipulated were wrong, but this one is right about this.

    Show me the proof of hidden data. Not some made up report.
     
    #3453     Mar 30, 2021
  4. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    DeSantis' dilemma...

    [​IMG]
     
    #3454     Mar 30, 2021
  5. jem

    jem

    Are you on L.S.D?
    it was not hard data.

    it was an excess deaths type model.


    "That's the conclusion reached by a new report published in the American Journal of Public Health. The paper projected average deaths over six months in 2020 using historical data. It then compared that number to the actual deaths in the same time period. The results were staggering, even in a state with over 33,000 reported deaths."


     
    #3455     Mar 30, 2021
  6. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao


    upload_2021-3-30_14-22-52.png
     
    #3456     Mar 30, 2021
  7. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    They're grasping at straws now, as recovery in Florida accelerates.

    Nevermind that if you took the death count they magically created and assign it to COVID, Florida still doesn't get as bad as NY, NJ and other states in the deaths per 1M pop.
     
    #3457     Mar 30, 2021
  8. destriero

    destriero


    Can some do a welfare check on snark?
     
    #3458     Mar 30, 2021
  9. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Ahahahaha.....as expected, it was all a bunch of horseshit.




    A Yahoo News story warning that “Florida COVID numbers face new scrutiny” incorrectly framed the key finding of the study it profiled, according to the principal researcher of the study in question as well as other researchers quoted in the same article.

    “Florida is undercounting the number of people who died from COVID-19 by thousands of cases, casting new doubt on claims that Gov. Ron DeSantis navigated the coronavirus pandemic successfully,” begins the fear-mongering story, published by Yahoo national correspondent Alexander Nazaryan on Tuesday.

    The story was built around a study published this month in the American Journal of Public Health, which …
     
    #3459     Mar 31, 2021
  10. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading


    The National Review — LOL
     
    #3460     Mar 31, 2021