He doesn't even draw charts or do any of his own work. All he does is have a bot tell him articles to post.
Once again... this is the raw data. And may I say the charts do not reflect this data. For example your raw data shows 1 death attributed to the date of October 11, 2020. The second chart you posted attributes 8 deaths or more to October 11, 2020. The charts are hopelessly out of sync with the raw data, hopelessly out of sync with each other. It is not even clear where the charts are getting their data from despite one claiming it to be some file on gihub with Florida Department of Health data. Show us the original source of both charts -- otherwise it is meaningless to have a conversation.
Yes, the first one does. It matches the data exactly. The second one is simply another source to show the difference in trend between deaths reported and deaths as date of death. The second and first charts have different sources. The second chart seems to have an update time of after the data in the first (10:45AM). Tomorrow we should see an additional 7 deaths in this category, otherwise I'd have to ask the guy who made the second chart where he got his data. But the first chart and the raw data are aligned perfectly. They are not "hopelessly out of sync with the raw data". Focus on the first chart. I do not support the second one and I've tried to get the raw data from it but so far have been unsuccessful. The first chart and data are exact. And the data comes from the DOH website. Deaths as reported differ greatly from deaths on date of death. this has been brought up numerous times. You got your ass kicked on this topic before and you had no response to it. Shall I dig up those posts?
Actually, they do match. The author just replied that he has the same data and his chart shows 1 death (if you look closely you can see the small bar to the right). So you're wrong. Again. you don't find it valuable to have a discussion because, as usual, you duck and cover the moment you are found out to be the fraud you are.
Yet the previous day and two previous days to that shows sections of the bar associated with the color for October 11th. Provide us with the original source of the chart --- otherwise it is meaningless.
It's not meaningless. The source is the SAME SOURCE. How many times do you want me to repeat that? 10/9 - 9 deaths 10/10 - 2 deaths 10/11 - 2 deaths 10/12 - 1 death All there in the data. Same source. you're being intentionally obtuse because you know you've got no ground to stand on.
Please provide the original location where both charts were posted. Then we can have the complete context have a rational discussion. You are being intentionally obtuse because you don't want to provide the original source of the charts -- as stated earlier any idiot blogger can create a chart.