Ok, maybe you can clarify what you are trying to get to in the original post that started our back and forth. Because, and I'll be honest here, I don't know what you're trying to get to or what you're looking for. This is often the problem I seem to have with you, particularly.
I've just illustrated, in one day, problems with your posts. Have they have nothing to do with underlying posts. Now you suggest that I am the problem. Ok, what part of my response do you not understand? Which do you not understand, the first part, or the question afterwards?
Look, we always go through this. I make a post, and you come into the thread later and you make a comment to me. Then I try to answer your post and we then spend the next few hours with you telling me all the things you aren't saying while I try to guess what you are trying to say. Its really exhausting. You can't possibly enjoy it either. Unless your point is to troll, but I rather doubt it. I've just illustrated, in one day, problems with your posts. Have they have nothing to do with underlying posts. This doesn't even make grammatical sense. If you don't want to discuss anything, do us both a favor and don't reply to me. I give you my solemn oath that if I ask you a question, I will clarify exactly what I am looking for. Would be great if you were more interested in engaging and less in making this about what you're not about.
Ignore my commentary. Again, "Which do you not understand, the first part, or the question afterwards?"
I made the comment that no one was pointing out issues with how the governor in NY behaved when it came to nursing homes. Your reply was this: I never said the NY acted contrary to anyone's advice. All I said was no one in this thread was pointing out anything about NY that occurred much in the same manner to that it did in Florida. So I really don't know what you're on about. I tried to guess, but it was next to impossible. So do you want to discuss anything or can we just forget we ever started talking?
I'll simplify. We had a situation. The experts (CDC) said do this that and the other. NY followed the advice. If that advice was wrong, then that's on the CDC, not NY. FL didn't follow the CDC's (experts) advice. FL followed Trump. So that's on DeSantis. That's why NY is not comparable to FL. The CDC offered no guidance on nursing homes. But they did offer guidance on what DeSantis chose not to follow. Simplified further: NY followed the CDC's advice. FL didn't.
You've got to be kidding here. I asked you: And you said So you make the argument that NY followed the CDC. I ask you to show me where the CDC said to do it. You said you didn't make the argument. So we get into this back and forth and then, again, you make the argument that NY followed the CDC's advice! Can any innocent bystander who is reading this clarify whether I am losing my mind and not following this correctly? All I want to know is where did you see that they followed the advice? I'm not even saying it isn't true. I just want to see where you saw that. Is it at the CDC's website? Where? Holy christ on a bicycle.
You've got to be kidding me! The CDC gave advice. NY followed the advice. FL didn't. Is that much clear? The CDC did not give advice as to nursing homes. So, NY didn't act contrary to the CDC. FL acted contrary to the CDC. Clear?