Really? Did you read what I wrote or are you just a low IQ individual who assumes I said something I didnt. Did I say anyone has a right to kill someone else? Am I wrong that people are better off without criminals on the planet?
You might want to reread your earlier posts in your own thread before you accuse someone of “Going with the narrative”. It seems you want to live in a world where cops can do no wrong. A world where there are no criminals. Such a world, if realized, by implies there is no dissent. By the people. At any time. How would new ideas be generated in such a world? How would one adapt to change? How would our species evolve? What about innovation? Without new ideas and a growing population, how would resources be efficiently allocated? In world history, we have seen glimpses of such worlds in certain countries or ages. Nazi Germany, England during the Dark Ages, and Soviet Russia. I suppose China at some point in their history should get an honorable mention. How about present day North Korea or Iran up to a few years ago? A country or two in South America, perhaps. It appears your political philosophy is weighted heavily towards authoritarian. Since you support Conservative points of view, we can rule out you are a Communist. Authoritarian and Conservative? Yes, it sounds like you are a Fascist. Thank you for answering my previous questions from earlier posts. I knew you would. So please, tell us about the benefits of Fascism as a political philosophy. Thank you again in advance.
Fascist? Do you mistake me for a liberal? They're the ones who want authoritarian rule...at least as long as they're in power.
I use the word Fascist to describe a system where Big Government and Big businesses work together in a Crony Capitalistic way. Looking up the definition of Fascism on Wikipedia.org: Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, as well as strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. Does not the above political philosophy apply to you?
Why did you look it up on wikipedia instead of the dictionary? Oh, because it doesn't mention "far right". Here's from the dictionary. a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. Which side today is forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism? Twitter banning conservatives. Google banning zerohedge. Lefty's harassing a business if someone employed in that business says something they don't like, thereby putting them out of business until they have no choice but to fire the employee or close up shop. Do you see conservatives shutting down free speech? In Nazi Germany, the Germans shut down Jew owned businesses. Today, Democrats/left wing media shut down conservative owned businesses. YOU are on the side of fascism. But they...keep searching the internet for definitions that fit your narrative.
Good catch. I looked up “Fascism” on 4 online dictionaries and 3 of them did not mention “Right wing”. The one that did, was called “Oxford Reference”, not to be confused with Oxford Dictionary, a membership required site. Oxford Reference’s definition of Fascism looked like it was written by grade school children. Looks like evidence of politics on Wikipedia.org. For all your flopping around though, you have not answered my question. Is this be because you have a personal belief that you know most people find repugnent? You can’t bring yourself to renounce authoritarism, but you don’t want to publically announce you true position. I’ll ask you again: Are you supportive of Facism as a political philosophy?
The cop that did the shooting in Atlanta has been charged with murder. So predictable. The cop in Minneapolis and the cop in Atlanta will be found not guilty of murder. The cop in Minneapolis could probably be convicted on manslaughter but they overcharged him thinking to delay or defer what is coming next. What is coming next is widespread rioting and looting. When both of these cops are found not guilty that will signal a green light to get stuff. Now they come right up onto Rodeo drive and get the good stuff. There will be house-to-house looting. When people try to flee their movement will be restricted. No dashing for the Hamptons. The left will have more time to plan this one and they would prefer civil anarchy to another Trump term. Its inevitable and it has great inertia.
The Hamptons will be a designated no-go zone. Remember, some of the Democrat mob bosses have their homes there. If a mob, especially several mobs, get out of hand in that regard, I suspect we are a gene-splice away from a longer term, if not permanent solution to such unauthorized behavior. You happy now?
Against it. Although I disagree with you that most people find it repugnant. I think most people love fascism as long as it aligns with THEIR beliefs. The kind of fascism people hate is the kind that goes opposite to their beliefs. Of course if that fascism DOES align with their beliefs, they never think of it as fascism...they think of it as "doing what's right"