Huh? You have stopped making sense. Covel is very clear--are there interviews without real voices? Can you swim if there is no water?
Good for you. Very good for you. Pretend you are interviewing Flavia and you have a stopwatch. Soon you will say times up. But a few questions into the real voices you miss hearing what is written down. What was written down was that Flavia's clients who use models apparently have told her that models "do not deal with context." Naturally you move right past this seminal fault Flavia has put on your table. Covell starts a booklet with John Henry and his 20% and says "x hazardous years" He glides right on past the hazards. The screwed up definition of a trend enters stage left more than halfway through the book. Back to models and Flavia........ Are model users wrong.....? Did Flavia get it wrong......? Did you fuck up one more time with real voices......? Treating the CW emotions is handled in BF. If these emotions are occurring, then....... Right. We get the solution for improving models. THE BIG QUESTION? First I have to correct the question. The stupid question thought up by you and guys like Covell is: "Why are you afraid?" I have to correct four words to respond to a voice that just said: "Why are you afraid?" My version is: Q. Why are you ______ and are always in the market all of the time and taking the full offer of the market segment by segment (see yesterday's posted charts)? A. Because I have a single model that always deals with the changing context and my emotions are continually feelings of support, comfort and confidence. These feelings come from always "knowing that I know" based upon a comprehensive scientific model.
You can do better than this, don't play dumb ... Written questions and written answers is interviewing too, and it has the advantage that the reader can do his own judgement, and no transcript errors or interviewer interpretations can happen. Covel is interested only in making money from interviewing, isn't it?
Children swim in parks where they jump into pools of tennis balls and swim all around. Flying fish swim in air as do seals and penquins. Covell got fooled by many many people who knew he didn't know anything about trading markets. You think one of your guests was "ranting". What is the name for what a person does when he doesn't understand what the other person is speaking about? You do not know you do not understand somethings. The person speaking to you knows you do not understand. Markets are based upon Science. They are defined using the tools of science, mathematics. You do not understand mathematics. You do not understand deduction. Covell is in the same boat you are in. Bring up my posts on the scope and bounds of trends stated in finite maths terms. I just when through my notes in binders and counted the names of the parts and their combinations in the full and complete market system. A system is better than a model. Examine my work in the early 10's, the 00's, the 90's, the 80's, the 70's the 60's and the late 50's. Get back to me if you have any questions that I can rewrite and answer for you. Check out any of the fields I have worked in.
You need to be careful about the names you throw around, Jack. Some of us actually are friends with the people you are talking about. I know Oliver Moore of yachting magazine. I have spent time on his boat at the ocean reef club in key largo. He has never heard of you and knows nothing about a yacht sale to his treasurer. In addition, I have contacted Glen Larson to determine if he has even ever heard of you let alone hosted an event with your students. Will advise of the response. surf
LOL Dude, you are the biggest name dropper on this site. I sometimes wonder if the old Hungarian knows you call him "the Dark Lord" and post pictures of him and the chicks he's banging who are probably his great granddaughter's age. Yeah get back to us after you find out about the event host having heard of the Hersheypotamus. FYI, I was at an event in Vegas that was probably similar. Attendees did pay $100 each to help cover costs of the event, so maybe event sponsor is a better title.