A nice reprint indeed. The only thing not addressed was where the bad guys got the guns the good guys were trying to prevent them from using. I can tell you - they got them from "law abiding" gun owners/sellers. That's where. And that shit' has got to stop.
Tampa always has to resort to personal attacks, because he cannot win an argument on merit alone. Strike FOUR, your out again, you STILL failed to backup your original bloated empty assertions. I'm not going to bother replying to your post since you once again conveniently ignored all the flaws I pointed out in your argument. Here is a broom for you to sweep the shattered remains of your position with No need to pulverize the shards of your argument into a finely milled pile of dust. I'll let my summary stand. peace axeman
tampax:Axie baby, does the US Constitution guarantee you Freedom of Speech? Yes, indeed it does. Can one or more States alter or restrict that right? No, they may not. Tampax baby... I can't resist. How can you be wrong so many times? States HAVE restricted freedom of speech. Are you this ignorant of the law? Never heard of any slander or defamation laws huh? How about harrasment laws? You continue to cling to your fantasy that any STATE restriction of a constitutional right, fully negates the constitutional right. Strike five. peace axeman
I can tell you - they got them from "law abiding" gun owners/sellers. That's where. And that shit' has got to stop. Tampa ______________________________________ Where is "stolen" or purchased from "illicit dealers". Another trait of liberals is total lack of civility. Recognize anyone?
The other fallacy to this lame argument is where the implied responsibility lies. When a drunk steals a car and runs over a bunch of people do we try to blame the car owner? Do we try to sue the auto makers? Of course not. Completely absurd. peace axeman
Axie, the broom was so cute...but again you ain't quite got things right... There are no laws prohibiting slander or liable. You can slander me till the cows come home, and you won't get into trouble with the law. But you might have a problem with me - the State permits me to sue you in civil court for any damage/harm your fals words may have caused. Your right to Freedom of speech is between you and the Government - you have no right to Freedom of Speech with me - I am not compelled to listen to you, or to put up with false declarations. As an example. I can stand on a street corner and proclaim the government to be over-run with crooks...no problem. But if I call you a crook, I could indeed have a problem. Perchance instead of searching for cute gif's to post, you might take the time to think before you make a fool of yourself...
Axie, I think that you mentioned that you have a gun on your nightstand. If so, are you in the bedroom right now? Are you even in the house where the gun is? Axie, you tell me that you want a gun to protect your family. I am a reasonable man. If you feel threatened, if you feel that your house is vulnerable, and subject to entry from evil doers, I understand that. What I don't understand is a man who tells me that the place is crawling with bad guys, and his home is likely to be entered by said bad guys, why would he leave his gun behind, out of his direct control? And why shouldn't I blame such an irresponsible individual for his carelessness with a deadly weapon should that weapon end up in the hands of a bad guy? And don't try to "sweep" this one away.
Sorry tampax.... checked with my attorney friend and he explained that there are general public safety statutes in every state which further restricts public speech. This is what makes yelling fire, say in a crowded court room, illegal, and would get you arrested quite quickly. Maybe YOU should take the time to do some research before making yourself look like a complete fool for calling someone a fool who is correct. peace axeman
I don't have a gun on my nightstand. I never said that. You must be desperate to resort to complete fabrications. "What I don't understand is a man who tells me that the place is crawling with bad guys, and his home is likely to be entered by said bad guys, why would he leave his gun behind, out of his direct control?" Maybe because the LAW forces him too. Thanks for pointing this flaw out. "And why shouldn't I blame such an irresponsible individual for his carelessness with a deadly weapon should that weapon end up in the hands of a bad guy?" For the very same reason you don't blame a person for leaving his car keys in his home, which is then broken into, stolen by a criminal, and used in a mass slaughter later that day. If the home owner left his loaded gun on his front lawn, and then claimed he is not responsible because it got stolen, then I would agree with you. But that is not the case. A criminal forcefully breaking and entering, and using property to commit further crime cannot be pinned on the home owner. peace axeman