forcing more spending cuts than otherwise would have occurred well dumbass, as I pointed out earlier I could take it out but that makes your argument weaker. They started fall 1997. you said that you could asses with certainty the effects of tax cuts on GDP, the only way to do that is with a flawless model. Even moderately sophisticated people know that, therefore you are a low understanding simpleton parroting some lefty material.
Wow You wrote this AFTER I already listed the Taxpayer relief act of 1997 which included the capital gains cuts.
Except the part where revenues were reduced by 0.2% resulting in no effect on the budget. So you didn't take out the data to make me look good and not because you were making a mistake, that's believable! Please quote the words 'certainty' from my posts in that effect, I will wait.