Dem rep urging 'civility' had called for FL guv candidate to be shot...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by John_Wensink, Jan 11, 2011.

  1. I'm sure he had a legitimate excuse for his statement.

    Politics from the Nation's Capital
    Dem Congressman who called for GOP Gov. to be put against a wall and shot now pleads for civility

    Ex-Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa., pens an op-ed in the New York Times today about the proper political response to this weekend's tragedy. I wholeheartedly support the former Congressman (Kanjorski lost his seat in November) when he argues that, following this weekend's shooting, Congressman need to remain open and accessible to the public. However, Kanjorski is rather hypocritical when he climbs up on his soapbox:

    We all lose an element of freedom when security considerations distance public officials from the people. Therefore, it is incumbent on all Americans to create an atmosphere of civility and respect in which political discourse can flow freely, without fear of violent confrontation.

    Incumbent on all Americans to create an atmosphere of civility and respect? Congressman heal thyself! Yesterday, I noted that, according to the Scranton Times, Kanjorski said this about Florida's new Republican Governor Rick Scott on October 23:

    "That Scott down there that's running for governor of Florida," Mr. Kanjorski said. "Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him. He stole billions of dollars from the United States government and he's running for governor of Florida. He's a millionaire and a billionaire. He's no hero. He's a damn crook. It's just we don't prosecute big crooks."

    I'll give Kanjorski the benefit of the doubt that he did not literally mean Scott schould be killed. Regardless, Kanjorski's way over the rhetorical line compared to the kinds of statements liberals are pointing to as evidence that Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh are creating a "climate of hate," to borrow Paul Krugman's phrase. And somehow I doubt that there would have been crickets from the national media if a Republican politician called for a Democratic candidate to be shot barely a week before the election.

  2. No, no, no. It can only be "hate speech" if it doesn't come from a Dem. And if a right winger, or POSSIBLE right winger commits heinous crimes, we should immediately and continually invoke the political relevance, kind of how the left immediately broke the faux news story that the shooter was linked with a "far right, antisemitic group". However if a lefty who reads lefty tomes like mein kamf and marx, who's close friends describe as being a leftist, commits a heinous crime, we should not think of it in any political terms because the assailant was "just a nut" and his political orientation is not relevant. You know, kind of like how only white people can be racist??
  3. pspr


    He speaks with forked tounge, kimosabi. :cool:
  4. Lucrum


    Yet more democrap/liberal/progressive two faced, do as we say not as we do hypocrisy.
  5. Incumbent on all Americans to create an atmosphere of civility and respect

    That shit went out the window with the birth of anti smoking nazi's in the 90's.