They adjusted almost all the warming into the data and they refuse to show anyone their working papers that describe how the data was adjusted. It's the antithesis of science and their hoax only plays to the gullible as hell.
Link to the peer reviewed source please for this adjustment you are talking about, let's science for reals.
So you agree that to claim man made co2 causes warming you should have to have peer reviewed science in a peer reviewed science journal showing it?
Citation needed when I claimed that CO2 alone is responsible for all the warming, I have always maintained that GREENHOUSE GASES are to blame Here are some peer reviewed studies http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v410/n6826/abs/410355a0.html http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2009/2009JD011800.shtml http://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2006/techprogram/paper_100737.htm
so you agree that there is no peer reviewed science stating man made co2 causes warming. I just want to get this straight for agw trolls like convertibility and futurecurrents regarding what science actually has proven. I have no problem stating that greenhouse gases keep heat in, in theory. And that they probably do in real life in our atmosphere. As someone who follows science you would also understand that greenhouse gases also keep warming out. I have linked to NASA studies proving this fact here at ET.