The articles I posted earlier show a drop in black admission rates and increase in Asian admission rates after the ruling. Go back in the thread and read them. I am not going to post the same thing over and over again.
I am stating a fact that the courts stated...NO SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE EXISTES TO SUPPORT A CLAIM PLAINTIFFS WERE DENIED ADMISSION BASED ON RACE. It's in the court.documents. Both sides provided evidence and 2 courts said no evidence. SC decided.to overturn precedent and fin something unconstitutional..did not find that plaintiffs.were denied. owned.3x
Yes... it will be interesting to find the initial filing. I expect some California legal database will have it online -- but it probably requires a fee to access.
There is only one admissions year since the U.S. Supreme Court ruling. The impact in university admissions was immediate. And I was quite correct that the black admissions dropped and Asian admissions increased as the universities changed their DEI admission policies -- all outlined in many articles bewailing the change and citing data. Having only one year of data so far is hardly a "own", I am sure that future years will show more of the same. Time will tell.
Your concern not really relevant to factual discussions. Johns Hopkins.saw Asian admissions increase Yale saw Asian admissions decrease... So that refutes your statement as facts often do. If Asians thought they were getting slighted it majes sense the would apply in greater numbers. % of applicants not stating their race at all increased. So that skews numbers big time. How did bi racial kids get counted? Facts matter..not your opinion.
First.. please provide the source of your claims that John Hopkins saw an undergraduate Asian admission increase and Yale saw an Asian undergraduate admissions decrease after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling. So your argument is that Asian students applying in much greater numbers after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling thereby leading to a greater number of Asian students being admitted. Conversely the argument is that Black student applied in lessor numbers are the U.S. Supreme Court ruling thereby leading to a fewer number of Blacks being admitted. To either prove or disprove this thesis would require data on the number of applicants by races and the percent & numbers admitted by race. This would provide the basis of any factual changes to the admissions by race.
My claim is your opinion is not relevant to actual facts... Asian enrollment at top colleges Princeton, Yale and Duke down —admissions group claims discrimination You know why you do not have any credibility with anyone on this forum any more? Because it would have taken you 5 seconds to google the above article from NYPost and others but you do not want to face facts that dont fit your narrative. Also, these fucktards sue and after the SC rules in their favor they still bitch and whine that Asian Americans are not getting preferential treatment. IT WAS NEVER ABOUT DEI AND THAT BULLSHIT. That group of Asians were just entitled whiners who wante dto cry they were discriminated against. You were completely fooled by those fucks.....they do not care about anyone else and constitutional arguments, if that were the case they would not claim discrimination AGAIN after race was supposedly eliminated. Wake up.... the Asian Americans who sued only did so because the entitled fucks didnt get what they wanted. next up is claiming Yale and Princeton did something beind the scenes to discriminate against the Asians because God forbid an Asian gets rejected from a school.