you are misrepresenting the situation. you have no idea if the FBI source is real. you have no idea if the FBI has access to the emails if they exist even if the FBI had no physical access to the source of the emails... Wikileaks in London is overseas. I am sure they are surveilled. The FBI did not deny they were investigating the email leaks. To the contrary... they have been investigating the email leaks. the only thing busted is your b.s. and finally julian assange strongly implied Rich was the source of his leaks. I saw the interview.
The FBI is on record saying there is no FBI investigation unless you are saying that FBI's Virginia office is investigating but even then, the field office won't be in the dark about such a thing. The whole FBI smokescreen is officially busted. Rest of your points are irrelevant since FBI is on the record that they are NOT investigating this case. As for deflecting this into the FBI leaks investigation, Fox has been busted before for making stuff up about the FBI. http://www.mediaite.com/online/bret-baier-apologizes-for-mistake-in-reporting-clinton-fbi-story/ Anyway, your boy Wheeler said he will release evidence today, let's wait for a few hours to confirm he is a liar. Just don't bet on it.
That's just pathetic. The point is that if something is scheduled to happen at a future date - just because it hasn't already happened doesn't mean the information doesn't exist. Did I even have to explain this or you were too embarrassed and came up with a lame comeback.
Sounds like Wheeler has busted this cold case wide open and lefties are scurrying around like cockroaches looking for dark crevices to hide their Russian hacking allegations. Manefort and Flynn...aren't those the Americans who broke into several voting stations the night before the election and, hacking into the machines, rigged them to vote for Russia and Trump?
He was supposed to reveal evidence today, where is he? If you can show me the evidence, I will personally apologize to every right winger here and disappear from this sub. That's how confident I am of the bullshit being peddled, you Cons get easily conned by these money grubbing sideshow Fox correspondents.
So the FBI never comments on evidence while a case is open, but they comment on when they will present evidence they can't talk about, and so, we don't know they have? And so, they do comment when they have an investigation open...or not?
Let me make it very very simple for you since you seem to have trouble following the conversation FBI can comment when asked IF AN INVESTIGATION is happening - like Rich's murder (NO FBI investigation) or Trump-Russia (ONGOING FBI investigation) What the FBI doesn't comment on is the EVIDENCE collected during the investigation. Two different concepts Comprende?
So you are saying Wheeler is Fox news, and Fox news is Wheeler, and Wheeler is voicing the views of the heads of Fox news for pay? You mean like Wheeler is "staff" for Fox, and also gets their coffee for them?
Who told you there was or is an ongoing FBI investigation into the Trump-hacked-USA-elections-with-Russian-hackers-who-hacked-into-the-voting-machines?