Yeah, and Britney Spears is an extra-terrestrial alien... You let me know when/if you wanna (re)join the ranks of the mentally competent.
If you think it is logistically impossible, perhaps there are things you are not aware of. Success is permission-based. A great example is Oprah Winfrey. She was allowed to become a billionaire after she became a known quantity. In the mid-1980s she was an investigative journalist and did a show on the Church of Satan/Church of Set. She had a Lt. Colonel in military intelligence on the show. He professed to be a member of the Church of Set (a spin-off of the Church of Satan). Apparently he was running pedophilia ring out of the Presidio in SF. Aquino was his name. It was an interesting show with Oprah on the attack. However, the mind-control technology was used against her until she became a known quantity with predictable behavioral response. To show the Church of Set/Satan's dominance, they planted a flag (so to speak) by allowing her to become a billionaire with full control over her thoughts and behavior. They believe it is magic. It isn't. It is a technology that affects brain patterns. See the article: Microwaves and Behavior in The American Psychologist 1973.
Wow you are arrogant. Omniscient man in a cave. Chem trails? If they add anything to chem trails it is most likely seeding for weather modification. Did you know that dropping silver-based compounds in the atmosphere creates rain?
By your comment above, failure must also be permission-based then. Who precisely gives the permission to be successful? I am not sure they are doing such a good job of running the economy these days. Do they also give permissions for inflation and deflation as well then? The "they" who planted a flag and the "they" who believe it is magic are either two different entities or have multiple personality disorder. Did another "they" give you permission to spill the beans so to speak? I agree with you that watching too much Oprah can also have deleterious effects. Did she have to give up her soul or something for the billion dollars? I think she is giving some of the money back these days. I think Dr. Phil is getting the permission these days. Several months ago, a poster whom I admire said that he had noticed that every serious thread on economics gets derailed somehow. Since I have read that the military admits to having people posting (I read that companies, used to "correct" wikipedia as well) better quality information, I no longer think that comment is so radical.
How can there be deflation when the money supply is being inflated? Deflation = reduction of the money supply Inflation = increase of the money supply I know that in recent years the meanings have been changed in dictionaries, but the above are the true meanings of the words, and they still hold true today. When you increase a fiat money supply, the result is higher prices, and the opposite is true when you deflate. But what people forget is that in a free market society with solid money, prices to come down, and that's a good thing not a bad thing. It's a good thing to pay less for something rather than more.
Really? Between 1998 and 2005 money supply in Japan more than doubled (monetary base went from 50trln yen to 113trln yen). Throughout this whole period Japan experienced steadily falling prices. So it's reasonably clear that the increase in fiat money supply doesn't always result in higher prices.
Apparently we accept inflation numbers to be whatever the government tells us they are. John Williams at Shadow Stats says both inflation and employment numbers are mickey-moused to be "officially lower" than actual.... all for political objectives, of course. http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data
Oh, no, not this again... John Williams also says that a hyperinflationary depression and a dollar collapse is right around the corner. In fact, he's been saying this since 2007, if I am not mistaken.
The money supply might be increasing but the velocity is falling. Money is parked in banks backstopping their toxic assets. If the economy heated up then the banks would be lending but is that going to happen under the Left's policies and their crony capitalism?