Oh I agree 100%. I think Martin is one of the best posters on this site. He also happens to be a condescending prick from time to time and I'm calling him on it. It's not a big deal. I wasn't put off too much and I hope he wasn't either. I am trying to make a point...
wages are sticky. prices are not. which is the opposite of your post. That's why living standards *decline* with high inflation. prices move but wages are "sticky" in comparison to prices and don't keep up. no wonder martinghoul questions you. then there are the usual clueless ones who claim they don't care about inflation because they can keep up with inflation.
Right, pls take my word for it that I am not testing your knowledge and I am not being condescending. Like I have said many times here and elsewhere, I argue with people, because most of the time, even when I disagree, I end up learning something. I am asking questions because I want to understand the other person's logic and also subject my own line of reasoning to some stress testing. To your point, yes, during periods of deflation, the value of paper assets declines in nominal terms. However, for a normal bank, the majority of its assets are loans. Deflation is good for the lender, since the value of the future interest payments in real terms increases in deflation. Furthermore, in deflation people don't like to lend, so a lot of the savings are simple bank deposits, which is by far the best, cheapest and the most flexible source of funding for banks. Take the Japanese megabanks, for example. They have done very well during the deflationary period in Japan. Their leverage is significantly lower than their peers in US and Europe, their loan-to-deposit ratios are a lot lower and did they have any issues in 2008? No. In fact, Mitsubishi was doing so well, they could afford to single-handedly rescue Morgan Stanely during the darkest days of 2008. Finally, if you actually look at what happened to the private banks in Zimbabwe during the periods of hyperinflation, it's pretty clear that no bank benefits from something like that. Banks in a hyperinflationary economy don't have any deposits, can't borrow, can't lend and die very quickly. I am happy to answer your question and I thought I was answering them. In my opinion, 2008 happened because of the accumulation of leverage at all levels of the financial system. The amount of leverage was so egregious that the system became extremely fragile and unstable. No, in my opinion, deflation in itself was not a major threat to the banking system. Deflation was only a symptom and a result of bigger underlying systemic issues that surfaced during the crisis. As to humanity surviving, this is not a very sensible point. Firstly, yes, humanity survived, but many societies perished, were conquered or absorbed or just withered away. Not sure if it's deflation that killed them, but why couldn't it have done? Moreover, human species surviving some calamity doesn't imply that this calamity should be welcomed and enjoyed. Like I mentioned, humans have survived and thrived in spite of hundreds if not thousands of bubonic plague epidemics. Does that mean that I am scare-mongering when I say that bubonic plague is generally not a good thing? Yeah, you're right, we get cheaper products, over time. But isn't it true that populations grow over time? So let me echo your statement: inflation IS NATURAL and is a consequence of population growth. First of all, the fall in the prices of a specific asset class isn't how I define deflation. Secondly, I would never say that it's a bad thing. I agree with you that it's very much a necessary process of normalization. Well, given the support that the Japanese population has thrown behind Abe, I'd say that they disagree with you about deflation. There's a few other indicators that deflation for Japan was a far from a "normal thing". Moreover, let's look at the real estate prices in Japan, like you suggest. Chart above suggests that by early 2000s real estate prices in Japan returned to the original levels of the early 80s. They even started rising slightly, which isn't surprising, given how much leverage the whole world was strapping on. At the same time, did Japan get any growth? Not really, compared to pretty much any other country in the world. And yes, I agree that artificially inflating anything at the expense of the rest of the economy is a bad thing, but "artificially inflating" is a far cry from "deflating". Finally, I always get really confused when people start showing pity and compassion for the "poor lower classes". I don't really get it. We're capitalists here, right, not socialists? If I have managed to become wealthy and powerful through my own efforts, I will use my influence to promote policies that favor me and my interests, such as lower or no taxes, less regulation, less government intervention, etc. Obviously, if, like you say, I benefit from inflation, I am gonna push for that as well. Why should I, as a self-interested capitalist, care about middle and lower classes?
Omega 3 from fish + 5mg lithium orotate fuels regeneration of nervous system cells, Neuro Optimizer by Jarrow == brain nutrition, probiotics, enzymes, Reish mushrooms, Hyaluronic acid == healthy soft tissues, D3 in wintertime... Not overdoing it nowadays
Unfortunately, the only way to become "wealthy and powerful" today is through supporting government of more regulation. It is insertion of authority where none belongs. That's the only way to get rich today. The technologists that make it big are either crooks, or naive and allow a 3rd party/government its intervention. In short, we are ruled by crooks who side with the government to make their wealth. As evidenced by the power of government growing ever larger.
Not exactly. I am saying that if you are successful it is because you were granted permission to be successful. That could be because you passed the "crook" test or it could be because you are naively oblivious to how your business is used to perpetuate the central banking system and government power.