ironchef, I was trader at TST (a year and half ago) for about 7 months and failed the combined 3 times and made it to funded once and failed. I am currently not a trader at TST and trade live now.
tommcginnis, Just to make sure I understand you, are you stating that TST only show a few days/weeks/months of a trader profitability and should show more trades or more months/years of a trader progress? I guess it's like me having one month of trading profits and start bragging to a new trader as if my one month of trading profits is normal. In your opinion, what would you propose the article reads so it does not look like a lie? What is normal? Just trying to understand you.
I think the trading world would be better with more light and less shade/mirrors. I think putting a shade over trading gyms would darken the world, not lend more light. Ugly though, that.
Yes, but the real world we live in ... better or worse? I say any opportunity to get funded is better than no opportunity. Suckers/Dreamers/Gamblers will find a way to loose their money with or without these companies being here.
Thanks tommcginnis, I apologize to you, but I really don't not understand post #11 you wrote or what your complaint is with TST. Unless you can break down for me in simple terms, I do not know what you are talking about man. The traders in the article are making money and to me, that's all its about. If its about something else, please let me know. I really don't see what the complaint is about TST. A trader pays a fee to trade, and trades and get funded. What is the big deal. The people in the article making money, that's all you need to know. I think at times, ET members makes things VERY complicated. The article was not about TST, only about profitable day traders winning.
Daytrader ore not theese two EA`S i have made one safer on "big"account only 17% DD and on smaller account a way more agressive one with a little over 50% ,but then again a lot more % gain