Da Bears!

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by Maverick74, Oct 2, 2006.

  1. Make your SuperBowl bet right now...

    LOL!!!

    Geez, you remind me of a fundamental trader who makes bets about what may happen next quarter...


     
    #61     Nov 19, 2006
  2. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    I knew it wasn't possible to have an intelligent sports conversation with you. Anyone else? Hell, I think Nitro offers more sports insight then you do Z. What do you when you go to a bar to relax. Oh wait, you don't leave your cave, nevermind. Nitro, where are you? Banjo? Gann?
     
    #62     Nov 19, 2006
  3. You are talking about a game in February in November.

    Too funny...

    Unless someone has already placed a bet on the Super Bowl, or is betting the games weekly, it doesn't matter what happens week to week beyond making the playoffs.

     
    #63     Nov 19, 2006
  4. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    I'm not asking about the superbowl, I'm asking about right NOW!!!!!!! Jeez. I said who right NOW has the best chance to beat the Bears? Where the hell are all the sports fans on ET? Someone save me from this Zzz torture.
     
    #64     Nov 19, 2006
  5. Right now, who cares?

    Are they playing the SuperBowl right now?

    LOL!

    Think for a moment Mav. Who had the best record before last year's SuperBowl?

    How about the last NBA Championship?

    How about the last World Series?

    How about the last NCAA Final?

    Don't you get it?

    Best record at this point means nothing necessarily.

    Bears fanatics, a disease with no cure...

    On any given Sunday, on any given Sunday...

     
    #65     Nov 19, 2006
  6. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    So according to you, there is no point to have any kind of sports discussion at all until the day of a given sports championship? So that means we can't talk baseball, NBA, college basketball, college football, NFL or even golf or tennis? Great. There will be no sports discussion until February. Wonderful.
     
    #66     Nov 19, 2006
  7. We can talk about which teams look to make the playoffs, that makes some sense. We can talk about who is playing with consistency. We can talk about who has playoff experience. We can talk about who we would like to have at quarterback, or as out coach in the playoffs.

    But this nonsense of "who is the best right now" is just juvenile...

    Each week ESPN and others have weekly ratings, they change all the time.

    It means nothing, nothing at all. The playoffs have meaning, all that matters now is playoff position. I wager Tony Dungee is secretly happy the Colts lost today...

    Now they can work on peaking at the right time, not weeks before the playoffs begin.

    You count out teams like New England, and I am sure a coach like Belichek is hoping eveyone does...

    Mav, you really don't appear to be interested in talking about sports, you are interested in talking about the Bears...and if you want to discuss it with nitro, be my guest.

     
    #67     Nov 19, 2006
  8. Unfuckingbelieveable.

    It is IMPOSSIBLE for ZZZ to have a rational conversation about anything.

    The more I read from that lunatic, the more apparent it becomes that he has ZERO social skills and thus has no friends or person to person interaction of any kind.

    Anyway, moving forward.

    Mav,

    1) I think the AFC is so much deeper than the NFC and their teams would be much more battle tested.

    2) I have serious doubts as to the ability of Rex Grossman to win a Super Bowl.

    3) I think the Bears schedule has been easy to say the least. Green Bay, Detroit, Minnesota, Buffalo, Arizona, and Miami are all sub .500 and the Jets and 49ers are at .500 (Granted, you can only play the teams on your schedule, but so far the schedule has been generous.)

    Right now the Bears are easily the class of the NFC and a very solid team. However, I think the Bears would have a tough time with any of the top 3 or 4 teams from the AFC.

    Just my $.02
    :)
     
    #68     Nov 19, 2006
  9. You ppl are too funny...da Bronko's who suck with Jake"da snake"plummer are even better than "da bears"...geeze..I believe that this year Indi will actually win it all.
     
    #69     Nov 19, 2006
  10. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Wow, a warm body with a pulse. Nice to get a normal human response. I agree, Bears schedule is weak, but then again, so is Ohio State's and they are probably going to win the NCAA championship. The Bears have played a week schedule but they have annihilated their opponents as well. I look at many of the strong AFC teams and some of the powder puff teams they played and they have squeaked by most of them.

    We need to break this down and look beyond schedules and look at actual matchups. If you are going to beat the Bears, it's going to have to be on the ground with a team that also has a lights out defense. I think this eliminates the Pats (weak running game), and the Colts (weak, but improved defense). I think Denver and SD are legitimate threats except I can't see Jake ever winning a superbowl nor can I see a rookie QB (Rivers) winning it all either.

    I still am inclined to go back and give the edge to the Pats being that their defense and their QB are among the best in the NFL and there is no other QB I would rather have in a pressure game then Brady.

    Grossman still has a lot to learn, but remember the Bears strength has never been their passing game, but their defense and running game. Grossman is just a bonus. As long as he doesn't turn the ball over in critical situations (a big if) he will be fine.

    I love how well the Bears are coached and they are about as complete a team as their is (is anyone talking about how good their special teams is).

    To me, it's all going to come down to the defense. Last year in the playoffs, it was their DEFENSE that let them down, not their offense, not Rex Grossman. It doesn't help having Mike Brown out for the season. But if their defense doesn't let them down, I don't see how the Pats would beat them. Of course the Bears are playing the Pats next week in New England, so we will have an answer there pretty soon.
     
    #70     Nov 19, 2006