Yet, you still respond, again, to me; rather than to the initial "violator." We all have seen who you are. And we are not surprised.
Next you will be trying to claim this is some sort of "Cancel Culture". Good luck with your nonsense.
Cancel Culture is off-topic. Still responding with off-topic posts to me; yet still, nothing said to the original violator. Just own who you are; the type of human being that you are.
“As a district, we define educational equity as when educational policies, practices, interactions and resources a representative of, constructed by and responsive to all people so that each individual has access to, meaningfully participates in and has a positive outcome from high-quality learning experiences, regardless of an individual’s characteristics and group memberships.” And this is why this is bullshit: you can't strive for all kids having "positive outcomes". We can strive to give everyone equal access to opportunities. But some kids choose affiliations (gang or otherwise) who negate or minimize the offered opportunities. Providing equal opportunities should be where our responsibilities end. What kids ultimately make out of them is their choice.
Were you implying joining a gang is an avoidable choice all of the time because let me make you aware of something, it is not. Gang membership is now often generational and geographical. Some parts of America are so dangerous because of the free flow of guns that joining a gang is actually a safety measure many kids have to adopt in order to protect themselves.
I implied nothing. I said that gang affiliation is a choice. And what to do with opportunities, provided with, is a personal choice. A vast majority of the US or Canadian population wants a system that strives for equal opportunities NOT equal outcomes. Joining a gang is not a safety measure or necessity. It is a choice and equally dealing drugs is not a way to survive but a choice to go the seemingly "easy route" in life to make quick bucks rather than working the tiller or bagging groceries at the local supermarket.
The Left is trying to redefine critical race theory because they are losing https://news.yahoo.com/left-trying-redefine-critical-race-174600042.html The Left tried to use last summer’s momentum from the Black Lives Matter movement to push its destructive ideas of so-called “anti-racism” and critical race theory. Now, they’re frantically trying to redefine the terms of the debate, as the momentum has built up against them instead. Liberals are now asking that you pay no attention to the curriculum behind the curtain. They have taken to insisting that critical race theory isn’t actually being taught in K-12 schools, even though there are clear examples that show that it is. The New York Times even wrote in July 2020 about the “anti-racism” programs being brought to parents and staff in various school districts. Another New York Times piece published just two weeks ago noted that critical race theory is a "framework that has found its way into K-12 public education." The controversial, Pulitzer-winning 1619 Project, which was riddled with historical inaccuracies and crafted on the false premise that the American Revolution was fought to preserve slavery, has also been pushed into K-12 curricula. The project’s architect, Nikole Hannah-Jones, is among the many liberals trying to cast critical race theory in the narrowest terms possible. She is trying to distance her shoddy “journalism” from critical race theory because the push against it is real and effective. As with nonsensical definitions of "assault weapon" or weapon of war" in the gun debate, the Left constantly tries to redefine the terms of debate when they are losing an issue. Were it not for the shield of the Supreme Court, abortion would be far more restricted in the United States. That is also a losing issue for them, so much so that they must redefine the pro-life movement as “anti-choice" and abortion is a “procedure” or, more simply, a “women’s rights issue.” In recent years, they have tried hard to shift attention from abortion itself to birth control. Now, they’re trying to erase their own connections to Ibram X. Kendi, Robin DiAngelo, and other racial hucksters whom they zealously promoted not long ago — people who, yes, have managed to worm their way into K-12 curricula. All of those school districts spending thousands on Kendi’s books, “anti-racism” programs, and bureaucrats with words such as “equity” in their title — now, these clowns want to make us all think that we imagined all of it. This is obviously a good sign. It means that the push against these toxic ideas, from both Republican state governments and the concerned parents at local school board meetings, is working. Much like Hannah-Jones did in constantly moving the goalposts on the merits of the 1619 Project, she and other liberals are doing the same here because they are losing the fight to indoctrinate America’s youth with their toxic and divisive racial obsession. We are on the right path, and the push to reject these ideas must continue apace.