You are as usual wrong: 1. The real Satoshi could have lost the key to the wallet. 2. The not Satoshi could have got a hold of that key. I am not saying either one actually happened, but could have.
As always, when you read the actual lawsuit, what was initially about and what was the purpose of it, you find a very different information than has been posted. The case: "Craig Wright sued Magnust Granath for defamation regarding a few twits that Granath posted" The claim: "Craig asked for economic compensation regarding those twits as he believes that they are insulting and defamatory" The result: Norwegian court do not see defamation on Granath twits and rule out compensation Craig as a result of the case is obliged to pay court fees for both sides. It was never about "if he was Satoshi or not" But obviously coindesk and websites related to cryptocurrency hurry to spread misinformation, they know that crypto boys will love it. Guys read the documents before posting, you look stupid if you follow like a sheep. Read the result of the Miami case where Craig had to present several documents that proved that he was not only involved in but also a co-creator of the cryptocurrency. Bitcoin was created by at least three people, all proven in the Miami court.
You're the one that's wrong. Craig might have been involved with the creation and been part of Satoshi's group, but he is not the original creator like he is claiming to be. If he would have said, "I was the co-founder of Bitcoin then everyone would have probably believed him, but no, he has to come off like he is the almighty creator but can't even move 1 cent of Bitcoin out of the creators wallets. That's how insignificant he is, and that's why he is getting everything thrown at him in court...
Did he say he lost the key? If somebody else got the key why wouldn’t they take some of the 13 billion out? Wtf are you taking about?
When you lose something, specially a digital key, that doesn't meant that someone found it or had it.