gwb, take a minute break,look at my chart i posted earlier 3 months later the new cases doubled and death toll tripled ,if this is not the the case in favor of ivermectin i don't know what is. You can see clear influence in results on state level. Study from Itajai which is 3rd ,4th or 5th most populated city in the state depends how you calculate it You can write all you want and broadcast this on TV screen 24/7 ,this is not going to change the facts I have nothing against those who believe your copy and paste articles.Pharma is a big business and obviously since gates is making 20 times returns on vaccines people jumped on the bandwagon,just don't tell any rational thinking person to believe any of it.
Anyone notice that brainwashed Ivermectin folks are no longer posting misinformation about India's declining Covid numbers due to Ivermectin ? Here's why they stopped hyping the wonder drug being used in India and they've stopped their bullshit misinformation/disinformation campaign about these particular countries. Case Counts Guess what, many other countries that the anti-vax people were promoting the wonder drug of Ivermectin but I won't bother posting each and every one of those other countries too that have similar results as India. Deaths (starting to increase again) Reminder, hospitalizations and deaths due in fact follow the case count numbers with a few weeks of delay. If the hospitalization numbers are too high or above the healthcare system capacity threshold...deaths do in fact begin increasing. I have not looked at India's recent vaccination numbers to see if they've protected themself against severe Covid illness. Yet, if it's low (less than 60%)...they will soon have some very big hospital capacity problems...resulting in more deaths. Edit: Vaccination is less than 60% and their booster is dangerously too low wrbtrader
We haven’t seen Lloyd Austin, SecDef, nor Mark Milley, Chairman of Joint Chiefs for a good 3 weeks when they went out to quarantine – even though they were jabbed and masked and shielded
Hahahahahhahaha. Your Pfizer study is flawed. Complete sham. This Brazilian Ivermectin study was actual science. Show me where the 39 (majority) of Ivermectin studies on ivmMeta were retracted? SHOW ME! You fucking lying big Pharma loser! GWB has been Wrong on everything for 2 years. EVERYTHING. And when he’s not wrong, he’s lying his ass off.
Please…you have no clue how science works. What is your science background? What diploma did you earn? In what scientific field have you worked? In what lab did you ever perform rigorous scientific experiments? :
here’s a pic of ExGroper and GWB doing science. Zero science background and they think they have a fucking clue how peer reviewed studies are performed. ZERO KNOWLEDGE.
So we are back to that you don't have single proper peer-reviewed study in a major medical journal showing that Ivermectin is effective at preventing or treating Covid -- just a bunch of nonsense from pre-print pay-to-play publications. On top of this all of your "large studies" have been debunked for having absolute fabricated crap as their data sets. You are aware that mainstream studies of Ivermectin for treating Covid are still underway by respected medical institutions and universities. However -- any of the results to date -- show that Ivermectin is totally ineffective for preventing or treating Covid. We will see what comes from the large-scale Duke University study which is still underway. Ivermectin as Potential COVID-19 Treatment Gets Studied at Duke University https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/202...covid-19-treatment-studied-at-duke-university Jan. 21, 2022 -- Doctors at Duke University are leading a national study to test whether three drugs could effectively treat COVID-19 — including ivermectin — according to The News & Observer. The study, which began last summer, is attempting to provide a comprehensive assessment of the controversial treatment. Ivermectin has been celebrated by some as a potential COVID-19 treatment and ridiculed by others who say there’s no proof that the drug works against the coronavirus, and in fact, could be harmful to patients. “There were some early studies that showed that it could potentially be helpful with COVID-19, but they were not large enough to be definitive,” Adrian Hernandez, MD, one of the study leaders and a cardiologist at Duke University, told the newspaper. “So we want to know either way, is it potentially beneficial or not,” he said. Ivermectin is typically used to kill parasites in animals, including heartworm in dogs and gastrointestinal worms in horses and cows. Since the late 1980s, the drug has been used in humans to treat parasitic infections and other illnesses. However, it’s not approved to treat COVID-19, and the FDA has warned that using the drug, especially formulations made for animals, can be dangerous. The FDA has received multiple reports of people who needed medical attention and hospitalization after taking ivermectin meant for livestock. At the same time, people have been trying the drug in hopes that it will treat COVID-19. That’s why it’s important to answer the major questions around it, Hernandez said. “We should understand if there are any benefits,” he told the newspaper. “And if not, we should be able to report that back out to the public clearly and note what shouldn’t be done.” The Duke study is testing three drugs under ACTIV-6, which is one of a series of studies of potential COVID-19 treatments and vaccines launched by the National Institutes of Health. The goal is to find treatments and vaccines that could make COVID-19 as manageable as the seasonal flu. The two other drugs in the study are fluvoxamine, a medicine often prescribed for depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder, and fluticasone furoate, a steroid medication prescribed through an inhaler for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). All three drugs are approved for use in humans, are proven to be safe, and are easy to use at home, the newspaper reported. They also rarely interact with other medications, which could make them good options to treat mild to moderate cases of COVID-19. “Just like we’re trying to do testing at home, we’re looking at how can you conveniently do treatment at home,” Hernandez said. About 2,500 people from across the U.S. have taken part in the ACTIV-6 study so far. To qualify, study participants must be 30 or older, have tested positive for the coronavirus within the previous 10 days, and have at least two symptoms. They receive an overnight package with one of the drugs or a placebo, and report how they’re feeling each day by phone or online. Researchers at Duke are looking for evidence that the drugs either shorten the time that people feel sick or prevent them from getting worse and needing hospitalization, the newspaper reported. With the recent surge in new COVID-19 cases due to the Omicron variant, enrollment in the study has picked up in recent weeks, the newspaper reported. Hernandez said the study team may have enough data to release initial results within in a month or so. More information is available on the ACTIV-6 study website.
Having grown up in a country with terrorist groups, people like this conspiracy muppet are the civilian base that supported them. He will reprogram to recent settings every time anything confuses him. Always seeking certainty of a sort as an emotional comfort. He knows things we don't know lads, ya know? Of course in the real world they get knee capped, just capped and made to leave for America.
It's time have insurers stop paying for crap which is totally ineffective for treating Covid... U-M study: Ivermectin doesn’t treat COVID, but insurers pay for it anyway https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-h...tin-doesnt-treat-covid-insurers-pay-it-anyway
If you read his posts from a few years ago and then his recent posts you might conclude, as I have, that GWB is suffering from some kind of "episode". He went over the edge around the end of 2019.