Nope. You haven’t. All you do is lie because your vaccine cult allows for no other answers to your Chinese Lung AIDS. Please show 39 of the studies linked in ivmmeta (the majority) having been withdrawn or retracted. Waiting. fuckin liar.
That's not how science works you dumb moron, you can't just group together bunch of small sample useless studies and make it a meta one because it suits your agenda. Retards everywhere.
Ya ya, vaccine cult like modern medicine cult or modern cars cult or modern airlines cult. Still can't post a SINGLE peer reviewed large sample study for his horse paste cult. VACCINE IS EXPERIMENTAL SO LETS TAKE HORSE PASTE WHICH IS EVEN MORE EXPERIMENTAL Says the inbred.
YES YOU CAN YOU FUCKING MORON That’s meta analysis - the gold standard of scientific study. Have you spent 5 minutes in a Lab outside of 10th grade Chemistry?? Don’t even answer - I know the answer.
Hahahahhahaha. 76 studies. it doesn’t matter how large a study / you would still find it too small and call Ivermectin horse medicine which tells everyone how fucking dumb you are.
Hey look another study came out. Ivermectin works! Anyone with a brain already knew this. The rest of you vaxxtard immune system lepers are lining up for your 4th booster. https://www.cureus.com/articles/821...3128-subjects-using-propensity-score-matching
Another non-answer from the evasive inbred. 76 he keeps saying but can't link to a single peer reviewed study with a large sample and not the 30 he keeps touting as evidence. This is why inbreds shouldn't do SAYANCE
"Observational Study" Published in Cureus Cureus was originally started as PeerEMed in 2009, and was re-launched under its current name in December 2012.[2] Under its system, after an article is published, anyone can review it, but the reviews of experts will be given a higher score.[4] Its peer-review process involves asking experts to review a given article in a few days, which results in its peer reviews taking much less time than those of most other journals do Do you realize how dumb you are? Go eat more horse paste.
Large, peer-reviewed research study proves ivermectin works Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to. Regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality rates. https://flccc.substack.com/p/large-peer-reviewed-research-study Intriguing findings Interestingly, the group who self-selected to take ivermectin was older and had more comorbidities than the group who opted for no treatment. These results show that prophylactic ivermectin may be a mitigating factor in groups with higher risk of morbidity.
Ivermectin study in the city of Itajaí contains several methodological weaknesses, resulting in questionable conclusions https://healthfeedback.org/claimrev...ological-weaknesses-questionable-conclusions/ It’s also of note that Itajaí actually saw the highest COVID-19 mortality rate in 2020 among the major cities in the state of Santa Catarina, another observation that casts doubt over whether the COVID-19 prevention program using ivermectin was actually effective.