The goal was not that vaccines are designed for herd immunity. Instead, its the public health policies that are attempting to use the vaccines to reach herd immunity. Not possible for many reasons that were not mentioned by the author (UKs top vaccine boss). For example: Vaccine hesitancy. Some people may object to getting a COVID-19 vaccine because of religious objections, fears about the possible risks or skepticism about the benefits. If the proportion of vaccinated people in a community is below the herd immunity threshold, a contagious disease could continue to spread. Protection questions. It’s not clear how long the COVID-19 vaccines will protect you from COVID-19. Further research is needed to see how much the COVID-19 vaccines reduce transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Also, research suggests that COVID-19 vaccines may have lower efficacy against some of the variants of the COVID-19 virus. New variants, which could be more resistant to vaccines, are regularly emerging. Uneven vaccine roll-out. The distribution of COVID-19 vaccines has greatly varied among and within countries. If one community achieves a high COVID-19 vaccination rate and surrounding areas don’t, outbreaks can occur if the populations' mix. Typically, vaccines are designed to protect the healthy in the population in which the public health policies then use the vaccinated healthy to surround those that can not be vaccinated (e.g. those that are immunocompromised). The fact that they're now talking about vaccinating the immunocompromised individuals with a 3rd booster shot and the fact the public health policies are now shifting to focus on the effectiveness of vaccines to minimize Hospitalization, ICU admissions, and Deaths... Less emphasis on the efficacy of vaccines while governments are realizing that 30% - 40% of the population will never allow anyone to give them a Covid vaccine in this well-connected social environment via the internet. My point, you're now going to see a shift in public health policies and by government leaders towards medical antiviral treatments to try to help those that refuse vaccination that then later becomes severely ill from a Covid infection. This is how you live your life with Covid or any other disease in a future Pandemic (we do get 3 Pandemics per century). You vaccinate the healthy and try to manage the disease in those that do not want vaccination via medical antiviral treatments when they become infected. In my opinion, the above will allow Healthcare Industry to become the fastest growing industry in the world. Cities will literally double or triple their number of hospitals and medical clinics in the next 10 years or they'll just extend or build up existing hospitals. In fact, I think new skyscrapers in cities will be hospitals. Seriously, 10 years from now, you could be a patient on the 60th floor. P.S. If you're someone looking for investments in stocks for your children's financial future...put hospital stocks in that portfolio especially after the way stocks moved via the Pandemic (black swan event) last year. This is how I'm exploiting this clusterfuck for my children's financial future. wrbtrader
How many boosters does it take to kill yourself from an ADE response? ICU NURSE: There are extremely effective ways of treating and preventing covid and big pharma and the government are doing everything they can to keep people from knowing it because they are making insane amounts of money selling you vaccines. https://rumble.com/vl2uxz-icu-nurse-youre-being-lied-to-about-covid..html
LOL - More fake ADE nonsense on Rumble. While you are over there remember to also watch all the white supremacist videos and the videos claiming Trump won the election plus all the other fabricated crap.
gwb thank you for occurrence validation ,you are useful. For everyone else who would like to listen i add they may like to watch as well https://rumble.com/vl2uxz-icu-nurse-youre-being-lied-to-about-covid..html
Conspiracy Video Platform Rumble Is Recruiting Its Own Motley Crew of Influencers Rumble, the destination for QAnon and anti-vaxxers, is partnering with a spectrum of non-MAGA diehards. https://gizmodo.com/conspiracy-video-platform-rumble-is-recruiting-its-own-1847473439
I stopped listening around the 50 seconds mark in the video when she told a LIE. Assuming she's an ICU nurse from the United States... Every Hospital in the state of Illinois, South Dakota, Arizona, and Kentucky does in fact tell Covid patients or their families about medical antiviral treatments. In fact, the CDC website list medical antiviral treatments. If you go to this well known link @ https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/treatments-for-severe-illness.html You will then find another obvious link @ https://www.covid19treatmentguideli...-cov-2-antibody-products/convalescent-plasma/ and https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ Heck, they even list supplements @ https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/supplements/ Let us pretend that woman and anyone like her do not know anything about the above two links. Shouldn't they have access to a cell phone or computer that has the minimum something like Google in which they can look up their local hospital about Covid medical treatments ??? We know two things about that woman...she lied in the first 50 seconds of the video and she's obviously not from Florida considering the governor of Florida is promoting a Covid Medical Treatment... https://www.npr.org/sections/corona...monoclonal-antibody-treatments-covid-19-spike Simply, if she's an ICU nurse in any hospital in North America...she needs help for posting misinformation that people are not informed about Covid Medical Treatments. Her message and yours now seems to be jealousy that these other Covid Medical Treatments are being recommended for Covid illnesses but not Ivermectin. Reality, there are some Doctors recommending Ivermectin and other not known Covid medical treatments that many say are bogus. https://thebulletin.org/2020/07/pro...bogus-cures-and-scams-of-the-coronavirus-era/ Van_der_Voort_4, your agenda has become more strange with these more recent messages of yours. Keep it together...don't fall down that rabbit hole of conspiracies about Covid / Vaccines because you will not be able to climb out of the hole. wrbtrader
@wrbtrader ,you did not listened beyond 50s that's fine,on another hand for anyone else description below may mean something different.or above for that matter,unfortunately. There are extremely effective ways of treating and preventing covid and big pharma and the government are doing everything they can to keep people from knowing it because they are making insane amounts of money selling you vaccines. Gentle reader this is an example how profits are more important than patient In Australia The Govt sent this to all active practitioners, threatening “investigation, regulatory action” (cancellation of medical license) and even criminal prosecution, if they say anything which goes against state/media dogma.
Ivermectin for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab591/6310839 Abstract Background We systematically assessed benefits and harms of the use of ivermectin (IVM) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods Published and preprint randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of IVM on adult patients with COVID-19 were searched until 22 March 2021 in 5 engines. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcomes included viral clearance and severe AEs (SAEs). The risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Inverse variance random effect meta-analyses were performed, with quality of evidence (QoE) evaluated using GRADE methods. Results Ten RCTs (n = 1173) were included. The controls were the standard of care in 5 RCTs and placebo in 5. COVID-19 disease severity was mild in 8 RCTs, moderate in 1, and mild and moderate in 1. IVM did not reduce all-cause mortality rates compared with controls (relative risk [RR], 0.37 [95% confidence interval, .12–1.13]; very low QoE) or LOS compared with controls (mean difference, 0.72 days [95% confidence interval, −.86 to 2.29 days]; very low QoE). AEs, SAEs, and viral clearance were similar between IVM and control groups (low QoE for all outcomes). Subgroups by severity of COVID-19 or RoB were mostly consistent with main analyses; all-cause mortality rates in 3 RCTs at high RoB were reduced with IVM. Conclusions Compared with the standard of care or placebo, IVM did not reduce all-cause mortality, LOS, or viral clearance in RCTs in patients with mostly mild COVID-19. IVM did not have an effect on AEs or SAEs and is not a viable option to treat patients with COVID-19. (More at above url) Effect of Ivermectin on Time to Resolution of Symptoms Among Adults With Mild COVID-19A Randomized Clinical Trial https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777389 Key Points Question What is the effect of ivermectin on duration of symptoms in adults with mild COVID-19? Findings In this randomized clinical trial that included 476 patients, the duration of symptoms was not significantly different for patients who received a 5-day course of ivermectin compared with placebo (median time to resolution of symptoms, 10 vs 12 days; hazard ratio for resolution of symptoms, 1.07). Meaning The findings do not support the use of ivermectin for treatment of mild COVID-19, although larger trials may be needed to understand effects on other clinically relevant outcomes. (More at above url)
get your booster shot gwb I direct my posts to objective reader,you are not in that category,nonetheless you are useful
I take it you have an issue with mainstream studies from respected medical scientists showing that Ivermectin is useless in preventing or treating COVID.