GWBe-lying You are a lying dangerous fuck of a piece shit human. You know damn well there are studies which show that it worked... Yes... and we know plenty studies saying it did not work in their studies... If someone cares they need to study this and determine things for themselves... Only a horrible human would mislead with the unequivocally and clearly uniformed or lying statements you make when you have no background to make them. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534595/ A total of 43 reports were found that examined HCQ treatment for COVID-19 patients. Twenty-five reported positive clinical efficacy from providing HCQ to for COVID-19 patients; 15 showed no improvement with HCQ and three showed worse clinical results in patients who received HCQ. Eleven studies in our review examined HCQ efficacy in patients in the outpatient or ‘day hospital’ setting; all reported positive results [8]. However, in two of the studies [9,10], the positive results, while clinically important (decreased risk of hospitalization and improvement in symptom resolution), were not statistically significant. We found 32 reports of HCQ treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Of these 32 reports of hospitalized patients, 14 reported good results, 15 reported no improvement and three reported worse results. Fourteen studies reported the time during treatment during which HCQ was initiated. In nine studies, HCQ was administered within 48 hours of admission. In six [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]] of these nine, improvement was noted. In three, no improvement was noted [3,17,18]. In five studies, HCQ was administered more than 48 hours after admission or in the intensive care unit (ICU). In two [19,20] of these five improvement was noted. In three it was not [[21], [22], [23]]. In 18 studies, the time of administration was not specified. Seven of the 43 total studies [12,17,20,[24], [25], [26], [27]] were chartless retrospective studies that used only billing codes. These studies all allowed initiation of HCQ treatment at times that differed with initiation of the control treatment, with HCQ presumably being chosen at the physician's discretion in worsening patients who were more in need of treatment. All such studies were thought to exhibit selection bias against a positive result. Four additional studies [9,10,15,16] had positive trends towards efficacy that did not reach statistical significance. In one study [22], 8% of the treatment group was untreated but not excluded from the treatment group calculations. In addition, the median level of treatment was only 67% of the specified treatment. Nineteen of the 43 reports were preprints or otherwise not peer reviewed. Twenty-four of the articles were from peer-reviewed journals. Of the 11 outpatient reports, all of which reported positive results, seven were peer reviewed and four were not. Of the 32 hospitalization reports, 17 were peer reviewed and 15 were not. Overall, 12 (50%) of the 24 peer-reviewed reports and 11 (58%) of 19 non–peer reviewed reports showed positive efficacy. Some studies provided HCQ alone; some included the addition of AZ and/or zinc. No difference in outcome was observed with the addition of AZ (Table 1), although all of the outpatient studies that provided AZ had positive results. There were no deaths reported as a result of HCQ, AZ or zinc treatment. Increased QTc was seen but not torsades de pointes (TDP). Adverse events that were thought to be likely due to HCQ treatment were not life threatening. No permanent sequelae were described. Adverse events are listed in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4. Table 5 provides a comparison of study treatments, settings and results. more at the link...
I have a thread for you... go read it and educate yourself. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/for-the-dumb-hydroxychloroquine-cultists.348140/
I just educated you... and we all see your lie. I do not need to read your crap. I already know that sometimes Hydroxy did not work in studies.
Superspreading Lies In a world of lies the only thing you can rely upon with regards to public discourse is that whatever you are being told is false. The exact nature of the lie and the motivation behind it are never easy to discern, but you can trust that whatever the authorities are saying is not factually accurate. This has turned every dissident into a modern-day Kremlinologist, examining the regime for clues about what is happening. For example, Republicans and Conservative Inc. have suddenly gotten religion on the vaccination stuff. A few weeks ago, they were focused on the personal-liberty aspect of the vaccination campaign. People should be free to decide if they want to take experimental medicines for a disease with a 98% survival rate. Conservative Inc. was against Covid passports and vaccine mandates. Suddenly, as if on command, they are on board the vaccine express. Mitch McConnell is now threatening lockdowns unless everyone gets vaccinated. The governor of Alabama wants to blame the unvaccinated for everything. Conservative goofballs like Sean Hannity are also pushing the vaccine. Chris Ruddy of Newsmax is now pro-vaccine, which is odd given that he markets to the aluminum-foil-hat crowd. “It is hard to know if any of these people believe what they are saying to one another.” For their part, the people who have been hysterical about Covid for eighteen months are now even more hysterical. The people animating the corpse of Joe Biden say they will mandate bizarre costumes if everyone does not comply. It is good to see that collective punishment is back in vogue. If that is not enough, agents of the state will go door-to-door to make sure you are vaccinated, comrade. https://www.takimag.com/article/superspreading-lies/
Our resident lying narrative spewing big pharma shill scumbag is not going to like this.... be ready for: "good luck with your delusions" "I have already debunked that" "I have already addressed this on another thread Facebook took that post down... but he will not address this..." (by the way I am not vouching for this... but instead of his bullshit I would like to see someone explain why it is not true.) "Will you believe this 97% eradication graph, or will you believe the propaganda pitched by the Big Media, Big Pharma, the WHO, and the FDA, who share massive financial conflicts of interest – those who say there is insufficient evidence? What evidence could be any clearer than a 97% reduction in five weeks? That number is better than the current vaccines and beyond the reach of most medicines. The WHO cautioned India they were making a mistake by using Ivermectin. They told them it could be dangerous, that there was no evidence it worked. How many lies will you buy before you stand up for the truth? The fatal mistake would have been to NOT use Ivermectin. Mercifully they used it, and they saved Delhi. But tragically, Tamil Nadu did not, and their state was devastated. Their new cases rose from 10,986 to 36,184 – a tripling. No one can hide that. Their refusal to use Ivermectin harmed them. Not only did Tamil Nadu's cases rise to the highest in India, but their deaths skyrocketed from 48 on April 20 to 474 on May 27 – a rise of ten-fold."
India had shut down during those periods. It would be interesting to see what the data looks like since June 1st now that India has re-open after heavy restrictions. Just as important, why does the article not list the number of patients that was taking Ivermectin during that time duration shown in the chart ? wrbtrader
Don’t see why it should be necessary to debunk the same nonsense over and again. Let me state it clearly — this claim about Ivermectin greatly reducing Covid cases in India is completely false. Basic fact checks from reliable sources clearly demonstrate thes claims are fiction.
As expected... can bullshit... not science. Show us the science... countering this claim... I want to know facts and science. I have no horse in this race..... Actually maybe I do.. .its either natural herd immunity of Ivermectin... right? Lockdowns never did that... that fast. "This graph shows that Ivermectin, used in Delhi beginning April 20, obliterated their COVID crisis. No one should be able to talk you out of this - not a salesman, a drug company, a television celebrity doc, and certainly not the top doctor for the WHO or the NIH who is paid to do that."
Just how many times do we need to debunk these fabricated claims over and over again. It is really getting old. Here are the facts -- go read them and educate yourself. There’s no proof that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin caused a drop in cases in India Neither drug is approved in the US for COVID-19. And the FDA and WHO recommend against using them to prevent or treat COVID-19. https://www.poynter.org/fact-checki...r-ivermectin-caused-a-drop-in-cases-in-india/ The claim: COVID-19 cases in India have declined due to the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin - FALSE https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...es-hydroxychloroquine-not-related/5173021001/ "Mountains of data" show drug ivermectin "basically obliterates" COVID-19 transmission. FALSE https://www.politifact.com/factchec...hecking-claim-about-use-ivermectin-treat-cov/ No data available to suggest a link between India’s reduction of COVID-19 cases and the use of ivermectin https://healthfeedback.org/claimrev...he-use-of-ivermectin-jim-hoft-gateway-pundit/