Read the 25 other peer reviewed studies you moronic anti-science Libtard! I’m sure you will find fault with all of them! Because Science!
Most of your concerns about Ivermectin studies have already been explained in the Youtube videos I posted. Clearly you did not watch them. I have to call out the FDA approved vaccines because they are causing too many deaths and side effects. I am trying be a responsible citizen and tell the world that the covid vaccines are dangerous, and we do not know what it will do to us later, say 3 years later. Whereas Ivermectin is proven to be very effective but currently being suppressed by Big Pharmas and FDA, so, I believe I am helping those that could still be saved to come to realization that Ivermectin is The Cure.
What complete nonsense. Covid: Misleading stat claims more vaccinated people die BBC - https://tinyurl.com/f48xyvvz Some people, including those pushing an anti-vaccine agenda online, have been claiming a large proportion of those dying with the Delta variant of coronavirus had been vaccinated. One conspiracy site even claimed vaccinated people were dying at higher rates than those who had not received the jab, which is untrue. This site and others use real figures in a misleading way, to arrive at a completely false conclusion - that the vaccine may not be working or even doing more harm than good. The latest Public Health England (PHE) figures show there were 92,029 confirmed Delta cases between 1 February and 22 June, most of which were identified in June. Of these, 58% were in completely unvaccinated people and only 8% were fully vaccinated. For context, by the start of June more than half of adults in the UK were fully vaccinated. If the vaccine weren't helping, they would be expected to see more than half the cases. So we can see the vaccine is reducing cases. Less alarming Of the 117 people who died with the Delta variant, first identified in India, 50 (43%) had been fully vaccinated. And on 13 June, a Daily Mail headline claimed the proportion of those dying who had been fully vaccinated had "scared" Prime Minister Boris Johnson into delaying the 21 June easing of restrictions, describing it as a "blow". But what these figures actually show is less alarming. The 43% figure relates to deaths only - so it misses all the vaccinated people who were exposed to Covid but did not catch it, or caught the virus but did not become very ill. And by now, almost everyone at risk of dying from Covid has been vaccinated (more than 90%). No vaccine is perfect in preventing people from getting Covid and therefore a small number of people will still die. And in a world where every single person had been vaccinated, 100% of Covid deaths would be of vaccinated people. But the actual number of people dying would be much lower - a 20th as many as if no-one was vaccinated, according to PHE estimates. The vaccines are already estimated to have saved 27,000 lives in England. Fewer deaths And there is another reason you cannot currently just compare the number of Covid deaths among vaccinated and unvaccinated people and come to any conclusions about how effective the jabs are. Because most fully vaccinated people are over the age of 50 - and therefore more likely to die - while most unvaccinated people are young and healthy.
New York Times best-selling author pens article ‘The Drug that Cracked Covid’ Ivermectin: The Forbidden Treatment 20/06/2021 Ivermectin: The Forbidden Treatment So why are journalists not covering it? Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author, and a six-time Pulitzer-nominated journalist published an article titled “The Drug that Cracked Covid.” The article chronicles the struggle between frontline doctors around the world to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment and the media outlets and social media companies thwarting them. Capuzzo said because of ivermectin there are “hundreds of thousands, actually millions, of people around the world who are living and not dying but the media has done all they can to “debunk” ivermectin is an effective, easily accessible and affordable treatment for Covid-19. Capuzzo said the media has parroted the arguments by health regulators around the world that there isn’t enough evidence to justify its use. Capuzzo, as a reporter, “saw with [his] own eyes the other side [of the story]” that has gone unreported, of the many patients in the U.S. whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the doctors leading the fight to save lives, Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. Through their leadership of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have enhanced treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to be used were met with a wall of resistance from healthcare regulators and a wall of silence from the media. “I really wish the world could see both sides,” said Capuzzo. Capuzzo published his article on ivermectin in Mountain Home, a monthly local magazine for the Pennsylvania mountains and New York Finger Lakes region, of which Capuzzo’s wife is the editor. Capuzzo says, “I don’t know of a bigger story in the world.” Total news blackout On Dec. 8 2020, FLCCC member Dr. Pierre Kory gave nine minutes of testimony to the U.S. Homeland Security Committee Meeting on the potent anti-viral, anti-inflammatory benefits of ivermectin. Nine million people viewed the video on YouTube before it was taken down by YouTube’s owner, Google. Capuzzo said mainstream and social media have gone to extraordinary lengths to keep people in the dark about ivermectin. Three days after Kory’s testimony, an Associated Press “fact-check reporter” interviewed Kory. Then she wrote: “AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. There’s no evidence Ivermectin has been proven a safe or effective treatment against COVID-19.” Like many critics, she didn’t explore the Ivermectin data or evidence in any detail, but merely dismissed its “insufficient evidence,” quoting instead the lack of a recommendation by the NIH or WHO. Twitter takes down Brazil’s health minister’s tweet On Jan. 12, 2021, the Brazilian Ministry of Health tweeted to its 1.2 million followers not to wait with COVID-19 until it’s too late but “go to a Health Unit and request early treatment,” (Ivermectin) only to have Twitter take down the official public health tweet for “spreading misleading and potentially harmful information.” Facebook takes down Slovak’s health minister’s post to use Invermectin On Jan. 31, the Slovak Ministry of Health announced its decision on Facebook to allow use of Ivermectin. Facebook took down the post and removed the entire page it was on, the Ivermectin for MDs Team, with 10,200 members from more than 100 countries. In Argentina, Professor and doctor Hector Carvallo, whose prophylactic studies are renowned by other researchers, says all his scientific documentation for Ivermectin is quickly scrubbed from the Internet. “I am afraid,” he wrote to Marik and his colleagues, “we have affected the most sensitive organ on humans: the wallet…” As Kory’s testimony was climbing toward nine million views, YouTube, owned by Google, erased his official Senate testimony, saying it endangered the community. Front-line doctors undeterred Undeterred, many front-line doctors have tried to persuade their health regulators of the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a covid treatment. They include Dr. Tess Lawrie, a prominent independent medical researcher who, as Capuzzo reports, evaluates the safety and efficacy of drugs for the WHO and the National Health Service to set international clinical practice guidelines: She read all 27 of the Ivermectin studies Kory cited. The resulting evidence is consistent and unequivocal, she said, and sent a rapid meta-analysis, an epidemiolocal statistical multi-study review considered the highest form of medical evidence, to the director of the NHS, members of parliament, and a video to Prime Minister Boris Johnson with “the good news… that we now have solid evidence of an effective treatment for COVID-19…” and Ivermectin should immediately “be adopted globally and systematically for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.” Ignored by British leaders and media, Lawrie convened the day-long streaming BIRD conference—British Ivermectin Recommendation Development—with more than 60 researchers and doctors from the U.S., Canada, Mexico, England, Ireland, Belgium, Argentina, South Africa, Botswana, Nigeria, Australia, and Japan. They evaluated the drug using the full “evidence-to-decision framework” that is “the gold standard tool for developing clinical practice guidelines” used by the WHO, and reached the conclusion that Ivermectin should blanket the world. “Most of all you can trust me because I am also a medical doctor, first and foremost,” Lawrie told the prime minster, “with a moral duty to help people, to do no harm, and to save lives. Please may we start saving lives now.” She heard nothing back. Dr. Andrew Hill, a renowned University of Liverpool pharmacologist and independent medical researcher, and the senior World Health Organization/UNITAID investigator of potential treatments for COVID-19 said Ivermectin was the only thing that worked against COVID-19, and its safety and efficacy were astonishing. Ivermectin, the WHO researcher concluded, reduced COVID-19 mortality by 81 per cent. https://albertapressleader.ca/?p=35541
VIDEO: MP Derek Sloan raises concerns about censorship of doctors and scientists 19/06/2021 Independent MP Derek Sloan holds a news conference on Parliament Hill to raise concerns about the alleged censorship of doctors and scientists as well as medical information related to vaccines. The Ontario MP has been critical of lockdowns that have been in place due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and also sponsored a petition questioning the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. He is joined by Byram Bridle (associate professor of viral immunology, University of Guelph), Dr. Patrick Phillips (family and emergency medicine physician in Ontario), and Don Welsh (professor of physiology and pharmacology, Western University).
So basically this is nonsense being pushing on all the anti-vaxxer sites. Let's take a look at reality, Ivermectin is just the latest "miracle drug" that the Hydroxychloroquine nuts have seized onto which will magically cure COVID. Ivermectin has no preventative or treatment benefits for COVID-19. The FDA states very clearly it should not be used. The FDA... Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19 https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consu...-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19 New COVID-19 drug, same playbook: Like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin lacks 'strong data' https://www.healio.com/news/rheumat...droxychloroquine-ivermectin-lacks-strong-data Ivermectin: why a potential COVID treatment isn’t recommended for use The antiparasitic drug was thought to be a potential treatment for COVID-19, but there isn't sufficient evidence to recommend its use, despite widespread support online. https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/ivermectin-why-potential-covid-treatment-isnt-recommended-use Ivermectin and Covid-19: how a cheap antiparasitic became political The common antiparasitic ivermectin is being touted as a miracle cure for Covid-19 by doctors and campaigners the world over. Demand for approval of the drug is growing globally – with some countries recommending ivermectin as a treatment for coronavirus patients – despite leading health authorities consistently warning against its use. https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/features/ivermectin-covid-19-antiparasitic-political/ Ivermectin is the new hydroxychloroquine - a drug shown to have no proven benefits in preventing or treating COVID-19; yet be harked as the new miracle drug from the lunatic fringe. You got to be a lunatic to push the use of a drug meant for parasitic infections in animals for the treatment of COVID-19. Ivermectin is FDA-approved for use in animals for prevention of heartworm disease in some small animal species, and for treatment of certain internal and external parasites in various animal species. https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterina.../faq-covid-19-and-ivermectin-intended-animals