COVID-19

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Cuddles, Mar 18, 2020.

  1. userque

    userque

    Anyone who is interested knows how to google for the evidence supporting:

    The fact that increasing the distance between people decreases the spread; and,
    A face covering is better than no covering; etc.

    Has nothing to do with being PC ... for me at least. It's simple logic/reasoning/common sense.
     
    #1021     Dec 22, 2020
  2. Turveyd

    Turveyd


    But Sweden's done very little of these stupid rules and is in a better place than us, with no lockdowns, so yes I can.

    The increase everywhere that puts bits of clothe over there faces in infections is also telling, bits of clothe where brought in to increase the spread, not slow it down.

    Obviously your ownly slowing it down, by a small amount at best, but when the amount isn't measurable, then the damage being down, isn't worth the benefit.
     
    #1022     Dec 22, 2020
  3. Turveyd

    Turveyd

    Yes and Washing your hands 20times per day would stop it, so pretty much everyone did, didn't stop it, bits of clothe ohhh didn't stop it.

    You just simply can't stop a virus spreading, without literally not being allowed to leave your house, which works pretty well for the shielders, but madness for those not at risk.
     
    #1023     Dec 22, 2020
  4. Turveyd

    Turveyd

    You think you can stop a virus, because you want to believe you can, cause your scared and people are dying, but the reality is, there is bugger all you can do and it's really not as bad as hyped so 3months without leaving your house is simply insane.

    30% death rate, yes 3months inside, 0.2% no chance!!
     
    #1024     Dec 22, 2020
  5. userque

    userque

    1. I never said anything about stopping the virus. I said distancing and masks can slow the spread.

    2. I never spoke about not leaving your home for three months.
     
    #1025     Dec 22, 2020
  6. Turveyd

    Turveyd

    And what is really sick, nobody cares about the at risk people dying, nobody cares that the shielding programs where killed ( UK ) other than the people previously shielding currently dying ofcourse, cause all they care about is themselves and they can't handle basic odds, 30,000:1 for a 50 year old, but everyone still worried that they'll be the 1 as some people will ofcourse be the 1 with a population of 68million, but 29,999 won't be so why worry.

    Left Shielding in place, assumed everyone else had the virus, then give the at risk the vaccine then let them out when there protected ( obviously shield or not, there call ). Not Rocket Science!!
     
    #1026     Dec 22, 2020
  7. userque

    userque

    Man up! You'll eventually get to go to the playground again!

    [​IMG]
     
    #1027     Dec 22, 2020
  8. Turveyd

    Turveyd

    1. Barely seems to slow the spread, especially the stupid lockdowns in the UK, which are just shop closures. Nothing visible on the charts from last UK lockdowns at all.

    2. Compared to the few countries Australia that killed it, that's what they did, option for them, but not, us so don't bother using that arguement as they've done well. Borders closed till Vaccine role out, although UK borders are closes aswell, but yeah different
     
    #1028     Dec 22, 2020
  9. Turveyd

    Turveyd

    See, just self interested, you don't care about the deaths, as long as it's not you.


    People, really sicken me these days.
     
    #1029     Dec 22, 2020
  10. userque

    userque

    I believe my serious responses to you show I'm not "just self interested." But since you continue to make the same illogical arguments; and continue to put words in my mouth, I simply said, I tried ... fuck it.

    My "fuck it" girly post was about you, not society as a whole.

    I will continue to care about my fellow man, and distance/mask-up etc. While you continue to say, "waaaa, it doesn't work!;" yet you want us to think you're a version of Gandhi or something.
     
    #1030     Dec 22, 2020