If these doctors are correct, the COVID-19 vaccines might be riskier than advertised. https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/d...ue-dire-warning-do-not-get-the-covid-vaccine/
Would u people start using en masse your fundamental right to commit suicide and stop polluting the gene pool ? At the very least as mentionned before getting the males around to acceptable testosterone levels, say where they were a few decades ago ( double today"s level) would help humanity quite a bit, likely more than a vaccine for a disease that significantly only affects the weakest of us all, although I prefer the first option.
I thought so, a shame really the situation doesn't deteriorate, I've never encountered a period when civil war was more justified. Can't be good for the human species to let the pro lockdown folks pass on their genes.
Nah, I d be happy to eat popcorn while the gas chambers fill up and maybe be pay to fill up the gas tank ( i m not against donating for good causes) but that's about as far as I d go. Doing my best to ignore the rules but not always easy, plus of course spending time teaching my kids how miserable society is as a whole, and how little they should trust or care for it.
Today in the Guardian: New medicine must prevent us from becoming ill from corona: "A lot of lives can be saved with this" British scientists are researching a new drug that could effectively prevent someone from becoming ill from the corona virus. According to experts, many lives could be saved this way. Antibody therapy could provide immediate immunity. Handy, for example, to prevent outbreaks in residential care centers and hospitals. Students would also benefit because they can spread the virus quickly. If someone did contract Covid-19, other members of the family could be protected from the infection. The operation has been appropriately named "Storm Chaser". Virologist Catherine Houlihan is leading the study and is a strong believer in its beneficial effects. “If we can prove that this treatment works, people exposed to the virus will remain safe. We already have an arsenal of weapons, but this could be the icing on the cake, "the Guardian said. AstraZeneca The drug is manufactured by UCLH (an organization that provides special services to six hospitals in the heart of London) and AstraZeneca. The pharmaceutical giant has already developed a vaccine that will probably get the green light next week. Ten test subjects are currently testing the drug. They were given the drug in two doses, one after the other. The antibody cocktail should provide protection for six to 12 months. If everything goes according to plan, the general public can use it from March or April. “The big advantage is that you are immediately protected. With a vaccine you still have to wait another month for the effects, ”says Houlihan. Paul Hunter, a professor and specialist in infectious diseases, also sees nothing but benefits. “This would be the perfect way to combat outbreaks in residential care centers. Or suppose you yourself become infected, then you can protect your live-in grandmother. A lot of lives could be saved with this. "
A video posted on Youtube from that Belgian Doctor Hilde De Smet, was within 24 hours removed from Youtube. Posting similar nonsense would result in a complete ban Youtube warned here. That tells a lot about the quality of the opinion of these 9 doctors. I can easily find 9 doctors who say the complete opposite. You need a majority of ALL doctors before you can have credibility. The website (which is registered in Panama) that is mentioned here has a link with a religious group. That kind of things make it at least suspicious. Click on the homepage of the website and click on "Peace with God". Many times Religion is in conflict with science (refuse vaccination, refuse blood transfusion...). https://created4health.org/how-i-found-peace-with-god/ An website from Panama that is interested in saving the US??? I just googled the first Dr, which is Andrew Kaufman and found this: Mark McClain, World Traveler and Avid Reader (1980-present) Answered May 7 · Author has 2.1K answers and 1.5M answer views Originally Answered: Who is Dr. Andrew Kaufman, the supposed accredited MIT scientist behind COVID-19 denialist theories? Are his arguments valid? I have spent some time trying to figure out who Dr. Andrew Kaufman is. According to London Real tv, who have posted Kaufman’s one YouTube video, say he studied at Duke, MIT and Medical University of South Caroline. Matching those qualifications to Dr. Andrew Kaufman and a forensic psychiatrist from New York is the result. I also found a disciplinary action from the state of Ohio in 2012 for Dr. Andrew Kaufman who studied at University of South Carolina and Duke. Here is the action of the Ohio Disciplinary Board: Andrew Russell Kaufman, M.D. Dr. Kaufman participated in a research project that offered participants a $25 gift code to Online Shopping for Electronics, Apparel, Computers, Books, DVDs & more as an incentive. After the study concluded Dr. Kaufman used nearly all the remaining gift codes, which had been purchased with unrestricted grant money from a pharmaceutical company, to purchase personal items. Dr. Kaufman later took steps to cancel the order and return the merchandise. However, as a result of his actions, Dr. Kaufman was suspended from the residency program and notified that his status would be listed as nonprogram completion, which caused his resident training license to become inactive. Duke University and Dr. Kaufman have since executed an agreement providing for a six-month remediation program beginning on January 1, 2009 that will enable Dr. Kaufman to complete his residency program. Before the North Carolina Medical Board In re: Andrew Russell Kaufman, M.D. Consent Order. 2008-11-26: http://www.circare.org/pd/kaufman_20081126.pdf I have no idea what expertise this guy would possibly have about the coronavirus. His specialty is psychiatry of the criminal mind. His one video is repeated by conspiracy theorists, but I could not find anything of relevant research. He has a YouTube video. Conspiracy theorists like it. Not the type of source I would deem reliable.