That is not what we were talking about. Here, some weekend reading: "Just how few votes would a candidate need to win 270 electoral votes?" www.npr.org/2016/11/02/500112248/how-to-win-the-presidency-with-27-percent-of-the-popular-vote (mind you, in the link they used 27% but the correct % is 23, as described in the article)
I have none. They are so different stylistically and while Suga is an amazing talent he's also fragile. It's hard to be a tall guy in that division.
True.One of my favourite strikers but gets chopped down by the monster wrestlers. Ill be rooting for Sugar but yeah not confident.
That is precisely the big trading problem traders have. That is trying to understand specifically why a move happens. What is way more important is that it did in fact happen and "how" it happened. Whatever caused it to happen should take a back seat. We can never know everything that caused a move to happen. Suffice it to say that institutions move price. It doesn't matter if a Fed announcement caused a reaction from institutions or if a sentence from Trumps mouth caused them to react. There are always at all times bullish and bearish institution in the markets and each will react to any news or statement or perhaps inside info if they get any. The same news can cause some to become more bullish and at the same time cause others to become bearish. So. What is important is what the chart say. It shows who is winning; the bearish institutions or bullish institutions. Or neither. Just back and forth. It matters not why just that they are.