Couric Exhibit A For Liberal Media Bias

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AAAintheBeltway, Oct 2, 2008.

  1. Amid all the snickering directed at Gov. Palin, Joe Biden's gaffes and poor judgment have been ignored, and no one has done a worse job than Katie Couric. Of course, Ann Coulter does not miss a chance to slap Couric around:


    October 1, 2008

    While Gov. Sarah Palin is being grilled on her position on mark-to-market accounting rules, the press can't bother to ask Joe Biden if he could give us a ballpark estimate on when Franklin D. Roosevelt was president -- or maybe take a stab at guessing the decade when televisions were first available to the public.

    Being interviewed by Katie Couric on the "CBS Evening News," Biden said: "When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed. He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"

    For those of you who aren't hard-core history buffs, Biden not only named the wrong president during the 1929 stock market crash, he also claimed a president who wasn't president during the stock market crash went on TV before Americans had TVs.

    Other than that, the statement holds up pretty well. At least Biden managed to avoid mentioning any "clean" Negroes he had met.

    Couric was nearly moved to tears by the brilliance of Biden's brain-damaged remark. She was especially intrigued by Biden's claim that FDR had said the new iPhone was the bomb!

    Here is Couric's full response to Biden's bizarre outburst about FDR (a) being president and (b) going on TV in 1929: "Relating to the fears of the average American is one of Biden's strong suits."

    But when our beauteous Sarah said that John McCain was a better leader on the economy than Barack Obama, Couric relentlessly badgered her for evidence. "Why do you say that?" Couric demanded. "Why are they waiting for John McCain and not Barack Obama? ... Can you give us any more examples of his leading the charge for more oversight?"

    The beauteous Sarah had cited McCain's prescient warnings about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But Couric, the crackerjack journalist who didn't know FDR wasn't president in 1929, demanded more examples from Palin.

    We are currently in the middle of a massive financial crisis brought on by Fannie Mae. McCain was right on Fannie Mae; Obama was wrong. That's not enough?

    Not for the affable Eva Braun of evening TV! "I'm just going to ask you one more time," Couric snipped, "not to belabor the point. Specific examples in his 26 years of pushing for more regulation?"

    This would be like responding to someone who predicted the 9/11 attacks by saying: OK, you got one thing right. Not to belabor the point, but what else?

    Obama was not merely wrong on Fannie Mae: He is owned by Fannie Mae. Somehow Obama managed to become the second biggest all-time recipient of Fannie Mae political money after only three years in the Senate. The biggest beneficiary, Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd, had a 30-year head start on receiving loot from Fannie Mae -- the government-backed institution behind our current crisis.

    How does the Democratic ticket stack up on other major issues facing the nation, say, gas prices?

    Shockingly, Sen. Joe Biden was one of only five senators to vote against the first Alaskan pipeline bill in 1973. This is like having been a Nazi sympathizer during World War II. If Sarah Palin does nothing else, she has got to tie that idiotic pipeline vote around Biden's neck.

    The Senate passed the 1973 Alaskan pipeline bill by an overwhelming 80-5 vote. Only five senators voted against the pipeline on final passage. Sen. Biden is the only one who is still in the Senate -- the other four having been confined to mental institutions long ago.

    The stakes were clear: This was in the midst of the first Arab oil embargo. Liberal Democrats, such as senators Robert Byrd, Mike Mansfield, Frank Church and Hubert Humphrey, all voted for the pipeline.

    But Biden cast one of only five votes against the pipeline that has produced more than 15 billion barrels of oil, supplied nearly 20 percent of this nation's oil, created tens of thousands of jobs, added hundreds of billions of dollars to the U.S. economy and reduced money transfers to the nation's enemies by about the same amount.

    The only argument against the pipeline was that it would harm the caribou, an argument that was both trivial and wrong. The caribou population near the pipeline increased from 5,000 in the 1970s to 32,000 by 2002.

    It would have been bad enough to vote against the pipeline bill even if it had hurt the caribou. A sane person would still say: Our enemies have us in a vice grip. Sorry, caribou, you've got to take one for the team. But when the pipeline goes through and the caribou population sextuples in the next 20 years, you really look like a moron.

    We couldn't possibly expect Couric to ask Biden about a vote that is the equivalent of voting against the invention of the wheel. But couldn't she have come up with just one follow-up question for Biden on FDR's magnificent handling of the 1929 stock market crash?

    Or here's a question the public is dying to know: "If Obama wanted a historically delusional vice president, why not Lyndon LaRouche?" At least LaRouche didn't vote against the Alaskan pipeline.
  2. You seemed to have no trouble when Hannity gushed over Palin as he interviewed her, and asked her tough question like, "Isn't it just terrible when those unpatriotic Democrats...[insert disparaging remark here]...?"
  3. sho-tim


    I'm glad to see you've been watching a quality channel. A little more time there, and you may come to your senses.:p
  4. Dude. Get a grip.

    Palin is being targeted because she's an airhead.

    She can't even answer something as basic as "what do you read?" and we expect her to run the country and keep us safe from the evildoers?

    I think she wears a beehive to hide the surgical scar from the full lebotomy.
  5. Actually, I saw an excerpt of Hannity's mock interview of Palin on the Daily Show. However, during commercial breaks of legitimate news programs, I occasionally tune in to Fox News when there are no cartoons on any of the other channels. And I keep asking myself, as I watch Fox in disbelief for those few moments, "Is this parody?"
  6. Wasn't "Assassination Insurance" or something like it why Nixon chose Agnew as his VP?
  7. She didn't handle Couric's attack interview very well. That's not my point. Couric pretends to be an objective journalist, not an opinion commentator like Hannity. I don't mind her being aggressive, provided she is (1)fair and (2)treats the other side the same way. Couric failed both these elementary tests of good journalism. No wonder her ratings continue to fall.

    To put it another way, I'm not interested in Couric's assessment of Palin or Biden. We have commentators like Haniity and Olbermann for that. Is it too much to expect her to act like a professional journalist?

    Palin may well be an airhead, or perhaps she is a decent person who is not well-versed in the kind of personal destruction attack journalism the mainstream media practices on conservatives. Either way, why no follow-up on Biden's incredible gaffe that put FDR as president during the great Depression and on TV? Maybe Couric wasn;t aware that he was wrong? Can you imagine the outcry if Palin said something like that? Don't tell me there isn't a double standard at work.
  8. Where legitimate, probing questions are asked?

    As for Biden's gaffe(s), what more is there to say? He obviously got it wrong and everyone knows it. Palin, on the other hand, tries to slither out of answering questions in a reptilian manner rather than simply saying she doesn't know the answer, and you expect an interviewer to give her a pass. She wouldn't even say which periodicals she reads, probably for fear that she might be asked who her favorite columnist is, which would then expose that she (probably) didn't even read such periodical. Why else would she not even give one single example? Not one.
  9. Wow - I just had a flashback to an old interview that Bobby Fischer did (I think it was shown in "The Great Chess Movie") where some guy asked him about his favorite books, expecting him to give some great literary names. After looking uncomfortable answering, Fischer finally said "I'm really mainly magazines."
  10. Yes, but Palin told Couric that she read all kinds of periodicals. Even so, she could not name a single one despite Couric's follow-up question asking for an example.
    #10     Oct 2, 2008