Okay, so Horowitz will not be appearing before the Committee then, because his review is the last review?
Ok so a bunch of Trump lapdogs are going to get a few bites at Horowitz in an election year. Why is this any different than when Clinton testified for Benghazi?
I am prepared to see evidence by any committee that alleges that that hillary's emails were accessed. Unlike you, I will not check their party affiliation first.
There are and will be similarities. For example, Susan Rice and Hillary were exposed as fucking liars in the Benghazi hearings, and any future hearings related to Hillary or to the dossier/unmasking episodes will do the same.
You must be joking. You can’t even accept an independent review by a highly respected inspector general that went toe to toe with Obama and you want me to believe you’re a fair arbiter of the truth. Those partisan hacks in the house care about one thing, political power, and they will do or say anything to keep or get it. The house is a joke under republicans. Devin Nunes should have been expelled and Rosenstein is right to push for an investigation of his staff. Speaking of Rosenstein- I know you knew it was bad news for you when he wasn’t half way around the world but delivering the report to Trump himself.
No, I said that he was out of the country or that I heard that he was - and he was actually in Montreal when I typed that or maybe I was reading something a day or two old. But he was in Montreal- which is sort of like another country last I knew.
Yeah. You answered a whataboutism with a whataboutism with another whataboutism. Are you going for a record?