Countdown to Horowitz beginning

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TreeFrogTrader, May 16, 2019.

  1. Yowzer.

    I have only read headlines today because I have been out and about. One of the article headlines was that Trump was pissed about Fox giving Comey softball questions. Maybe he was referring to previous Fox interviews with Comey, not sure.

    But I just watched the Comey interview from today- and Holy Shiite- COMEY THE CLOWN FAIL!!!!!!!!!!

    No doubt Trump wanted to see more blood, I know I always do, but Chris Wallace really did not cut him much slack and Comey failed on each and every question bigtime. And his face looked like his hemorrhoids were about to explode rather than this victory lap crap he has been attempting lately.

    Not lookin good there Director Clown.
     
    #911     Dec 15, 2019
  2. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    Hes not facing jail time like Trump and Rudy
     
    #912     Dec 15, 2019
  3. DTB2

    DTB2

    Wanna bet?
     
    #913     Dec 15, 2019
  4. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Trump is facing jail time for what? Are you referring to obstruction with respect to Mueller investigation.

    If yes and you think that is true, why didn't the dems include that in articles of impeachment?
     
    #914     Dec 16, 2019
  5. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pu...firing_for_rogue_officials_who_targeted_trump

    Voters Favor Jail, Firing for Rogue Officials Who Targeted Trump

    Voters are ready to jail or fire senior law enforcement officials who illegally targeted President Trump, but most think they are unlikely to be punished.

    The latest Rasmussen
    Reports telephone and online survey finds that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters consider it likely that senior federal law enforcement officials broke the law in an effort to prevent Trump from winning the presidency.
     
    #915     Dec 16, 2019
  6. Among other people, ask Michael Cohen. Maybe he has an idea.
     
    #916     Dec 16, 2019
  7. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    According to most of the libtards on this forum, if Trump is not reelected, it is a fact that he will be indicted for obstruction regarding Mueller investigation.

    If that is true and it is such a slam dunk due to overwhelming evidence, why didn't Dems include it in articles of impeachment?
     
    #917     Dec 16, 2019
  8. Because they didn't have to. Because it's a slam dunk as impeachable offenses go.

    The senate, a Trump subsidiary, will acquit him regardless of the charges.
     
    #918     Dec 16, 2019
    TRS likes this.
  9. Snarkhund

    Snarkhund

    He was not in the Salvadoran embassy. He is being held with no charges. He hasn't had an extradition hearing as there are no formal charges.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2019
    #919     Dec 16, 2019
  10. Yeh, I meant Eduadoran.

    But he is being held by the Brits right now for jumping bail which is not an extra-judicial process. It is part of their criminal law.

    And he has not had a final, formal extradition hearing to the United States, at HIS request, because he has asked the court for more time and delay to gather evidence.

    I am not up on his case of late so can adjust my thinking quite easily with more information, but I have not seen any evidence that he is being held "extra-judicially" as in some type of gitmo arrangement.

    The brits are holding him for jumping bail. That is a criminal charge. The plan was to process his extradtion request while he was being held on the bail jumping. Whether he is now being held just on the extradtion request because he has finished his year long bail jumping sentence, I don't know. Either way, those are both legal reasons for holding him.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2019
    #920     Dec 16, 2019