That's your standard spiel. Again, it fails. To take your bizarre pontification as reality would mean that you, Z10, can't be challenged on any point because to do so, in your mind, would denigrate you personally.
Yep, more of the same max. Same stuff as before. I criticize Coulter, Fatbough, Conservativism, Bush, Cheney and you make it about me. You simply cannot not make it not about me max, that is the nature of an obsessed stalker like you...
I heard Michelle Mailkin last night on O'Reilly criticizing Coulter. She sounded like the stereotype humorless grim-faced social values conservative who wants anything fun outlawed. You'll never hear one liberal criticizing another for anything, no matter how outrageous. It seems to be a pathology among Republicans that the minute anyone connected with the GOP becomes controversial, they have to leap in with both feet to show that they are not as bad as liberals say they are. It is a sign of insecurity and a prime reason conservatives never achieve anything. They are too busy tearing each other apart over minor issues. Sheesh, she made a joke. Get over it.
You are ALL a bunch of FAGGOTS! (someone had to say it) Thank god we aren't wasting any actual paper on this topic, just a tiny bit of disk-space
No, you called Coulter names and put up pictures attacking her person. Just like you're doing now with the "stalker" label in every post.
Coulter is a public figure with a known identity. I am not, yet you continue to focus on me, stalking obsessively as you have done with others in the past. Must be your nature...
What a life it is, huh? Anyone who points out your logical fallacies, hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty is a stalker. Perfect. 150,565 posts in 18 months, and yet when people respond to the disgustingly consistent blend of assertion, evasion and hypocrisy that makes up this vomitus, they're stalking you. In this very thread, your own words have been quoted to show that you've contradicted yourself. I showed the same recently when you accused Pabst of moral relativism, something which you have exemplified on these boards. You then post with some nonsensical justification in which you claim that your words are meaningless and just because you're guilty of a crime, it doesn't mean that you can't judge and verbally condemn others who are also guilty. You are twice-banned troll. And we're stalking you? No, Z. We're just pointing out the truth.
The Favored (but Futile) Attack of Z10; Playing the "stalker" card: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/searc...=1664188&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending