Due to this flawed medium I really can't tell exactly what your literary intentions are but knowing you I expect that they are good natured. That is very funny....haps. That's exactly how I feel. Wondering the desert not identified with either side. I'm out here looking for the Oasis in the desert. And when everyone finally gets here. I'll own all the damn property. (Me and the girl just watched Chinatown again)
Yup. I posed the same scenario to a moonbat on this site a while back as to if they had to choose between saving the life of a conservative American whose politics they despised versus a member of Al Qaeda, and their inability to answer spoke volumes. You don't think the hippies spitting on returning US troops from 'Nam calling them baby killers wouldn't have sacrificed them for VC? Jane Fonda touring North Vietnames anti-aircraft batteries ring a bell? Oh that's right, you don't comment on the left anymore, I forgot!
Good-natured of course! Just don't stay out there too long, the sun starts wearing you down, playing tricks on you, and before you know it you're yelling "Stimulus! Stimulus!"
Obviously liberals. They have almost completely ruined the country. Anyway, Olberman calls them the worst people in the "world", so I am casting a worldwide net. The irony--actually idiocy is more apt--is that Olberman's entire show consists of obsessive nit-picking over throwaway phrases that some conservative said or wrote. Then he triumphantly pronounces them liars or the worst person in the world,etc. Using his own logic, he should call them the worst conservative commentaor on Fox News, or the worst US conservative talk show host, or the worst conservative multiple NY Times best seller author. Not the worst person in the world. There are plenty of people worthy of that title and none of them live in the US. I wouldn't even put it on George Soros. As evil as he is, I'm not aware of him organizing genocides.
"the Republican Party has become the party of obstruction at just the time when all Americans should be pulling together for the good of our country." If this guy was really a true conservative then do you think he would be endorsing Obama's spending? He talked about how great the old conservatives were however all the true and old conservatives would never have agreed with Obama's spending yet this guy supports Obama's spending. Interesting. So he supports the spending. He also supports old conservatives. Thats like me saying I support abortion but I also support the people who bomb abortion clinics. Don't you see a conflict there thunderdog? I am sure you don't because you have been too busy memorizing junior high insults haven't you? You know I still want that PM so I can add to my arsenal. Thunderdog you once again prove your childish stupidity by not being able to realize that this guy is trying to sell a book. There is something magical when it comes to debating someone who is mentally unstable yet thinks he is actually a genius. Hey thunderdog next time you get that feeling of pure insecurity when it comes to your life and your opinions, listen to it.
Typical fuck face liberal distorting words. I said the debate between personal responsibility and government intervention is one of the most relevant debates. I also said that O'Reilly whether right or wrong actually takes the risk of debating these topics unlike your boy toy Olbermann who never once has debated anyone who disagrees with him. Again the substance and topic of the debate is very relevant. A cable news show as biased as the anchor is deserves respect for having real debates whether he is wrong or right depending on your beliefs. Olbermann deserves no respect. He reads a telepromter...Huh I wonder who else does that? Also please lend me some proof of Olbermann debating someone who disagrees with him just once on his show.
OK, it's nonsense. This guy is some loser trying to get on Tv or sell a book. He is smart enough to know that one tried and true way is to be a "former republican" who came clean. His arguments make no sense whatsoever. Republicans created the financial mess? FNM and FRE were democrat operations, run by democrat political hacks. Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and dozens of other democrats were instrumental in everything from pushing sub-prime affirmative action mortgages to protecting FNM/FRE when Bush was trying to rein them in. Let's not spare the NY hedge fund community and investment bankers, who we were told endlessly during the campaign were big democrat supporters. Much of thsi bailout culture got started under Clinton and his Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, the same dolt who steered Citi into the ditch while pocketing $120 million. Opposing Obama is somehow "obscene?" Why? Has the First Amendment been repealed? Obama has produced one giant spending/tax plan after another, all designed to fool the voters into thinking his carefully planned lurch into Chavez-style socialism is somehow essential to preventing the next Great Depression. Even lifelong democrat activists like Jim Cramer and Paul Krugman have taken Obama to task. The fact is we have a guy running the country who lacks the stature to stand up to the democrat crooks in congress and who apparently took his policy ideas from Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers.