You seem to know more about the Constitution than most of us here, including me. Did you graduate from Hillsdale College?
In order for this to be a serious consideration, tons of new evidence of fraud needs to surface which would make it impossible for Democrats and RINOs to look the other way anymore. ---I agree that right now there is enough evidence to overturn the election, but apparently it wasn't enough for state legislatures to step in, so Congreff is not going to either.
Oh, you flatterer. My education wasn't all that "rounded".... chemistry, biology, finance... and more than a cursory interest in American history. However I was a professional bowler for 10 years... Ha!
Declare Martial Law, prove the fraud and watch blue cities burn themselves to the ground. How do you win and stay legit? Eventually the top of the power structure becomes overbearing and strangles the economy. Hard to innovate while under a constant threat.
Martial law? Is election fraud such a "crisis"? (Is in my book, at least this one, but I doubt most would see it that way.)
I would settle for the lower courts and appellate judges to look at the evidence. Preferably, the US Supreme Court but, all the judges seem to only want to go along and ignore the evidence altogether without even looking at it? Rudy Giuliani wasted a lot of time with those hearings which showed massive election fraud but, never got the evidence reviewed by the US Supreme Court when lower and appellate courts will not even look at the evidence? That I think is a huge mistake and they should have elevated an appeal to the US Supreme Court as soon as lower and appellate courts denied all their motions.