They shouldn't be giving $600 out to people making the same money as they did in 2019. There's no common sense to this stuff.
So...you're saying it fools the "cons" by distracting while at the same time triggering them? Or are you saying that liberals receiving the money are somehow wise to this and know better? Actually, what the hell are you saying?
I believe he is saying if you made the same amount of money this year as you did last year, you weren't affected by COVID and thus the COVID relief shouldn't apply to you. I don't know that I agree with this, but I believe that is his point.
Exposed: The 7 Most Shocking Things In the 5,593 Page Stimulus Bil https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2020/12/41541/
10 Surprises Congress Snuck Into The Stimulus Package https://finance.yahoo.com/news/10-surprises-congress-snuck-stimulus-154026024.html The stimulus bill includes – but is absolutely not limited to – the following items: Families will be able to carry over unused funds in child-care and health care Flexible Spending Accounts into 2021. An increase in the deductibility of business meals from 50% to 100%. Even though there aren’t that many power breakfasts or three-martini lunches in these days of social distancing, President Trump thought it was important to include, according to the Washington Post. Funding for two new Smithsonian museums, the Women’s History Museum and the Museum of the American Latino. More things to do in Washington when we’re allowed to travel again! Creation of a new U.S. consulate in Tibet, guaranteed to cause problems with the Chinese government. $2 billion set aside for the Space Force. $500,000,000 for “Israeli Cooperative Programs.” Elimination of surprise medical bills, in which patients at an in-network hospital or clinic receive treatment by an out-of-network practitioner, resulting in shockingly high bills. Now, patients will pay the in-network rate for all services and the insurance company and provider negotiate the reimbursement. The repeal of rarely-enforced criminal laws prohibiting the transport of water hyacinths, alligator grass, or water chestnut plants across state lines; putting bogus theft-prevention decals on cars; or misusing the emblems of Smokey Bear, Woody Owl, or the 4-H Club. A section about the reincarnation and succession of the Dalai Lama. The prohibition of e-cigarette shipments through the U.S. Postal Service. (More at above url)
A couple of points: 1. congress passed an omnibus bill that included a spending bill and a Covid relief bill. Citing foreign aid as part of Covid tried is disingenuous. I get it gets clicks on the internet but it’s shoddy reporting. 2. The US is nearing $4 trillion in Covid expenses. That’s 4 times the stimulus package from 2009 and poverty is still skyrocketing. On whole we are spending much more for this crisis than many other countries, as a percent of GDP. The question is why. It’s actually very simple we don’t have the safety net programs that are normally associated with advanced countries so we have to create entire temporary programs from scratch which is very expensive.
Tucked into Congress’s massive stimulus bill: Tens of billions in special-interest tax giveaways The electric motorcycle and beer industries were among those that emerged as big winners https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/12/22/congress-tax-breaks-stimulus/ Congress on Monday unveiled a 5,593-page spending bill and then voted on it several hours later, with lawmakers claiming urgent action was needed to rescue an ailing economy ravaged by the coronavirus pandemic. But tucked in the bill was over $110 billion in tax breaks that strayed far from the way the bill was marketed to many Americans. These giveaways include big tax cuts for liquor producers, the motorsports entertainment sector and manufacturers of electric motorcycles. These measures, added onto the broader spending bill, are known as “tax extenders” — tax breaks targeted at specific, sometimes niche industries. And routinely extending these “temporary” measures has become something of a year-end tradition, despite loud complaints from some lawmakers who allege the votes largely benefit special-interest groups who stand to gain financially from the outcome. These tax extenders are designed to be temporary but are frequently renewed, often at the urging of industry lobbyists, and done so during late-night votes at the end of the year. (The Senate vote Monday took place shortly before midnight.) The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated the extenders benefiting industry and special interests included in the stimulus bill would cost over $110 billion over 10 years. How the stimulus deal came together Tax experts and good governance advocates have criticized such short-term tax relief extensions, arguing they hide the true cost of the cuts and advantage industries with the most well-connected lobbyists. “They are a gravy train for members and lobbyists, who repeat the same exercise every year or two,” Howard Gleckman, a tax policy expert at the Urban Institute, said in an email. “The lobbyists get to keep billing hours. The members get campaign money from the same people. Many of these are classic special interest tax breaks that do not benefit the overall economy in any way.” The enormous bill packages together emergency economic relief, government funding and tax cuts. The economic relief component of the bill is worth around $900 billion. The legislation included a slew of provisions that had nothing to do with coronavirus relief or funding the government, including many of the tax extenders. One measure, for instance, makes permanent a cut in excise taxes for producers of beer, wine and distilled spirits, which first became law in 2017 as part of the Republican-led tax cut package. The cuts were due to expire without congressional action, and the alcohol industry had pushed hard for their renewal, arguing that their businesses had been decimated by the pandemic. The industry has supporters among both Democrats and Republicans in Congress, who in turn pushed their leaders to include a bill making the cuts permanent “in the next appropriate legislative package.” Anheuser-Busch, the Distilled Spirits Council, Bacardi North America and the Brewers Association all lobbied Congress in recent months on the excise tax issue, lobbying records show. “I wrote this law for one purpose: to help small brewers and wineries and everybody in this space because the rules, the regulations, and the taxes were practically from Prohibition,” Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said in an interview. The excise tax cut has won praise in some corners. Ananalysisby the Progressive Policy Institute published last month argued that the cut helped fuel an expansion in brewery employment, a rare bright spot amid overall U.S. manufacturing decline. Another extension, of a tax credit aimed at helping the wind industry, sparked impassioned speeches Monday night as the Senate debated the bill. Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) introduced an amendment to strip the credit from the bill and was backed by Republican colleagues Kevin Cramer (N.D.) and James Lankford of (Okla.). They argued that the credits benefit a mature industry that doesn’t need the extra help, and that its benefits and harms had not been fully debated by lawmakers. Lankford said the wind production tax credit was a “zombie" that legislators had agreed years ago should be ended, only for it to be resurrected by lobbyists. Cramer called the credit a “market-destroying atrocity,” and called for an end to all tax extenders. “Let them all expire," Cramer said. “K Street wouldn’t like it, but it would be one less section in this giant package,” he said, referring to lobbyists. The American Wind Energy Association, the trade group for the wind industry, pushed back on the criticism. “We are surprised that wind energy was singled out amid a federal tax landscape that currently includes support for all types of energy sources,” said Bree Raum, the trade group’s vice president of federal affairs. “Wind energy provides significant economic benefits to America’s heartland, with states like North Dakota and Oklahoma generating over a quarter of their electricity from this clean energy resource.” Hoeven’s amendment was ultimately not approved. Another extension benefits the motorsports entertainment industry, such as NASCAR, by allowing for the faster write-down of costs related to their complexes. That provision, which has appeared in prior legislation going back to 2004, helps those companies lower their overall tax bills and has now been extended until 2025. A spokesman for NASCAR, which has lobbied Congress on the extension, did not respond to a request for comment. Another extender grants a tax credit to buyers of “two-wheeled plug-in electric vehicles” — that is, electric motorcycles. That credit is worth 10 percent of the cost of the motorcycle, up to $2,500. Manufacturers of the bikes, such as Energica and Zero, advertise the tax credit on their websites.