The summer of my senior year in college and right before going into the military...I did an internship in France and one of the viruses being researched in the lab I worked in was the Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) subtypes (A and B). Personally, I tend to view RSV as a very bad cold with a ton of mucus in the lungs that can easily result in pneumonia, cause heart inflammation problems, or respiratory problems. Yet, it's a nasty virus for children and the elderly but we suspected it attacks those with a weakened immune system from a prior (recent) infection from another disease. The prior (recent) disease that we study was the FLU and then individuals that developed RSV after recovering from the FLU. The lab suspected that RSV helped the FLU to create new sub-variants. Here's the key today about RSV...it was already on the rise in children soon after Covid hit and long before Covid vaccines. Currently, there's no vaccine for RSV but there are antiviral therapies. I do remember the rise of RSV in toddlers in the spring of 2020 soon after the Pandemic for Covid was declared and again another rise in the fall of 2020 as an RSV rash...both big rises in the number of cases occurred before Covid vaccines. RSV usually circulates during fall, winter, and spring, but the timing and severity of RSV season will vary from one year to another year. The question currently being researched by scientists about RSV as it has been for the past many decades...those that had a mild illness or asymptomatic to a recent infection to another disease...did these children, the elderly, or others that were exposed to that disease... Are there proteins from the other disease still in the body causing problems with our immune system that's making us susceptible to RSV after recovery from Covid and are there individuals that had a Covid infection that was so mild...they didn't know they had been infected with Covid ? Now look back in time at all the ET members that bragged about having Covid and saying it was just like having a cold or FLU...nothing to worry about. The real Covidiots are the ones that bragged that they had a child that only had a mild illness or just a cough from Covid and that Covid was nothing after their kid quickly recovered from Covid. Typically, these Covidiot ET members were the ones that argued extensively about face mask wear mandates, and hand sanitizer requirements at the doors of schools, public buildings, and government offices. Their names do not need to be mentioned because we know who they are and they are the same individuals that posted articles about face mask wear mandates being removed from schools (e.g. high school, elementary) and even daycare facilities as if they won a great victory...making it political as possible as if their freedom had been stepped on. Simply, we're a stupid population trying very hard to kill off our future because we still do not understand the medical consequences of making a disease / infection a political issue instead of a health crisis. The good thing...healthy people do not need to worry and that includes those that were never infected with Covid during this Pandemic even though scientists still do not know if there's a connection between a prior (recent) Covid infection and RSV. Those who are severely ill with RSV will most likely be hospitalized and may require oxygen, or intubation/mechanical ventilation. Most will improve with supportive care and are discharged in a few days after being treated with Palivizumab monoclonal antibody or antiviral therapeutic treatment. wrbtrader
Hey Avenatti, I have several of the other cornholers on this site this question, and not a single one of them has been able to answer it. Can you? If the vaccine is so great, why do you give a shit if other people get it? You can go get vaccinated, which would presumably make you safe, and their decision should have ZERO impact on you.
Hey Trump2020 predictor, who said I give a shit if you take it, I prefer you don't but if you are gonna make shit up like every other Trumptard then expect to be called out for your lies. How are those election audits working out for you? Trump will be sworned in soon?
UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS, 2005. (UNESCO) Article 6: 1. Any [face masks], [tests] & [vaccines] medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed of the person concerned based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE OR PREJUDICE . IT was always against basic human rights. All of it.
As usual you are pushing complete bullshiat. UNESCO calls for COVID-19 vaccines to be considered a global public good https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-calls-covid-19-vaccines-be-considered-global-public-good UNESCO’s International Bioethics Committee (IBC) and the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST) have called for a change of course in current COVID-19 vaccination strategies, urging that vaccines be treated as a global public good to ensure they are made equitably available in all countries, and not only to those who bid the highest for these vaccines. Both committees have a long track record in providing ethical guidance on sensitive issues*. Principles in the Nuremberg Code and UNESCO are compatible with vaccination https://factcheck.afp.com/principles-nuremberg-code-are-compatible-vaccination The posts on Facebook and Instagram also point to principles outlined by UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. At its general conference in 2005, UNESCO put forward a Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights with the aim to “provide a foundation for humanity’s response to the ever-increasing dilemmas and controversies that science and technology present for humankind and for the environment.” Article 6, referenced in the posts, says: “Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.” In legal terms, informed consent is a different standard than voluntary consent according to Wendy E. Parmet, Faculty Director at the Center for Health Policy at Northeastern University. “Informed consent implies not simply that the choice is voluntary, but that the choice is informed -- that the person actually understands the risks,” Parmet said. “These are complicated arguments that are completely reduced and simplified in a way that is completely misleading in the post,” Parmet said. She pointed to this 2005 paper, in which she detailed how informed consent and vaccination are compatible, arguing: “Informed consent advances four major goals: compensation of injuries, prevention of injuries, promotion of trust, and recognition of choice.” Lawrence Gostin, a professor who specializes in public health law at Georgetown University, also said the claim was “utterly false” as a person does not have the right to decline treatment and then transmit an illness to others. “Bioethics principles require informed consent but not if the individual poses a risk to others,” he told AFP by email.
Is that the pornstar Trump fucked as man representing the party of Family Values? You must be proud telling your kids that.
LOL, this is coming from a Clinton/Obama/Biden supporter! The democrats have no values and they are proud of it.